ReasonForOurHope

Monday, May 20, 2024

New Evangelizers Post: Theology and the Magisterium

                                                                    


 


I have a new article up at NewEvangelizers.com.  

A little while ago, the CDF released a document, Donum Veritatis, which addresses primarily theologians and the magisterium and how the two interact. The magisterum is the teaching authority of the Church, which is given to the pope and the bishops. Christ gave them the power and authority to teach in His name. The magisterium “must protect God’s People from the danger of deviations and confusion, guaranteeing them the objective possibility of professing the authentic faith free from error, at all times and in diverse situations.”

However, this is not necessarily the same job as the theologian. A theologian is “to pursue in a particular way an ever deeper understanding of the Word Of God found in the inspired Scriptures and handed on by the living Tradition of the Church.” The theolgian attempts to take the truths of the faith and find ways to explain them to a new generation. In our modern world, this is so important because, “In times of great spiritual and cultural change, theology is all the more important.”

In other words, the magisterium is charged to make sure the authentic truths of the faith are given. But the role of the theologian is to find the best ways to express the faith in ways that are effective. For example, as I high school teacher, I use lots of analogies to things that my students would understand: movies, social media, high school drama, etc. But when I teach the same subject to adults, I tend to pivot towards things that are more applicable to them: marriage, children, jobs, taxes, and the like. In both cases, I have to make sure that I am teaching the truths of the faith (as guarded by the magisterium), but I have to teach it in a way that my audience will understand (like the theologian).

We are all believers who are in need of the grace of Christ. Most lay people do not have the same depth of training on theological matters as the theologian or members of the magisterium. The document states that, “The theologian’s work thus responds to a dynamism found in the faith itself …Theology, which seeks the ‘reasons of faith’ and offers these reasons as a response to those seeking them…” Those seeking the reasons of faith are the lay persons. The theologian works at expressing these reasons in an understandable way. “Theology therefore offers its contribution so that the faith might be communicated.”

The relationship the magisterial authority of the bishop and the theologian is a “reciprocal relationship. The [magisterium] teaches the doctrine of the Apostles. And, benefiting from the work of theologians, it refutes objections to and distortions of the faith and promotes, with the authority received from Jesus Christ, new and deeper comprehension, clarification, and application of revealed doctrine.” This means that a magisterium should use the insights of the theologian to aid in its work of handing on the faith of the Apostles. But the theologian also is influenced by the magisterium: “Theology, for its part, gains, by way of reflection, an ever deeper understanding of the Word of God found in the Scripture and handed on faithfully by the Church’s living Tradition under the guidance of the Magisterium.” The theologian should not simply speculate in ways that are contrary to the faith of the Apostles. Instead, the magisterium offers the framework under which the theologian can gain insight into the authentic revelation of God and not merely into his or her own opinions and theories.

When St. Thomas Aquinas began incorporating much of Aristotle’s philosophy into his theology, there were many at the time who were dubious. There was a fear that this non-Christian philosophy could lead to a corruption of the truth. It was St. Thomas’s job as a theologian to explore the best legitimate avenues for teaching the faith. In this case it was using Aristotle’s language to explain things like transubstantiation. The job of the magisterium was to make sure that St. Thomas was not bending the Gospel in innappropriate ways to fit in with Aristotle’s philosophy. Sitting where we are now, hundreds of years later, we can see the benefits of St. Thomas’ project. But it is not always so obvious. For example, decades ago there was a surge in popularity of “Liberation Theology,” which was influenced heavily by the philosophy of Karl Marx. While the theologians weren’t wrong in exploring if any insights from Marx could be useful, they were wrong when they adopted the parts of Marx’s thinking that were contrary to the Gospel. This led to that famous moment when Pope John Paul II publically scolded Fr. Ernesto Cardenal when he visted Nicaragua (the situation was more complicated than that, but it was part of the issue). The Pope, acting as leader of the magisterium, saw that it was important to keep this theology from straying from the teachings of Christ.


You can read the whole article here.




Sunday, May 19, 2024

Sunday Best: Rest in Peace Dabney Coleman

 

File:Dabney Coleman (actor).jpg
photo by Aaron Rapoport

 

On Thursday, the irreplaceable Dabney Coleman passed away.

A few years ago, I wrote an article about Coleman being the most underrated actor whose skill has never been fully apprecieated.  Much of that article will be printed below.  I still stand by this statement.  Coleman was so good at his job that he made his work look effortless.  Because of that, I don't think we truly grasped what a talent he was.  Here is what I wrote back in 2021:


---

Sometimes actors jump out of the screen and burn themselves into your imaginations as bright, shinning movie stars.  Other times, there are actors who are so dedicated to their craft that they become staples of some your favorite movies without even realizing how integral they became.

Of the latter, I think of Dabney Coleman.

I mean absolutely no insult to him by not associating him with the former.  Coleman has much to be proud of, taking starring roles in several films.  But to my mind, I don't think he has ever gotten the recognition that he deserves for his skill as an actor.

Dabney Coleman is one of the finest and most underrated actors in the movies.  He had been working in film and television for years until his breakout roll as Mr. Hart in 9 to 5.  In that film he played the perfect villain as a "sexist, egotistical, lying hypocritical, bigot."  And yet even though he was the main antagonist, he brought a wonderful sense of charm to the role.  Coleman has a great screen presence which adapts perfectly to each comedic situation.

Throughout the years, Coleman proved to be an excellent comedian in films like Tootsie,  DragnetHot to Trot, The Beverly Hillbillies, and You've Got Mail.  He knew how to play broad comedy with strange, over-the-top personalities like the pornographer Jerry Caesar going up against straight-laced Joe Friday.  He also knew when to hold things in with subtle contempt like Nelson Fox, the oft-divorced father of Joe Fox.  

But Coleman is also one of the few actors who is just as good in a comedy as well as a drama.  His portrayal as Dr. John McKittrick in WarGames could have been a simple heavy.  But instead Coleman gave him several layers and dimensions.  You can see the different facets of his personality depending on the person with whom he is interacting.  However, there are two roles that really let Coleman shine:

The first is Cloak and Dagger.  In this movie, Coleman plays Davey Osborne's imaginary friend Jack Flack as well as Davey's father.  It is wonderful to watch Coleman play those roles so differently.  I remember as a kid that I never once confused the two characters and that is really a testament to Coleman.  His Jack Flack has all the swagger, charm, and deadly focus of James Bond, but Bond from a child's perspective.  He is everything that an action hero should be for a kid.  But Davey's father Hal is the opposite.  He is unsure, wounded, overly protective and reactionary.  In other words, he seems in many ways to be Jack's opposite.  And Coleman never goes too far or too showy with either performance.  He knows just how to play both characters.  There is a concrete realism to the way he plays Hal towards the end of the movie as he nervously tries to bluff his way to get to his son.  All the while, Coleman never cheats by having Hal turn into or start behaving like Jack.  Instead, we get to see Hal be his own kind of hero not as a super-spy, but as a man and a father.

But Coleman's best performance, hands-down, is in the movie Short Time.  

The movie has a fantastic premise: Detective Burt Simpson (Coleman) mistakenly thinks he only has 2 weeks to live and is days away from retirement.  However, his life insurance policy is only a "line-of-duty" policy, where it only pays out if he gets killed on the job.  So Simpson starts taking on the most dangerous cases in an attempt to get himself killed and in the process becomes an unwitting hero.

This movie has some truly hysterical moments.  The funniest for me is a car chase where Simpson gets closer to a dangerous get away car.  When one of them pulls out an M-60, he shouts, "Machine guns... ALRIGHT!"  When the bad guys knock his car down an embankment he shouts for joy... until he lands safely, realizing his seat belt saved his life.  The movie is filled with moments like this that are outrageously absurd and Coleman milks every laugh out of it.

But what makes this performance stand out is that it also one of his best dramatic performances too.  In the film, he is divorced from his wife (played by Terri Gar) for all of the usual reasons marriages break up.  But as he thinks about his life's mistakes, he reconciles with her in a scene that is so incredibly vulnerable and touching that I'm shocked its in the same movie.  What starts as a heart-felt apology blossoms into a rekindled romance.  But Coleman plays the perfect amount of joy and melancholy.  Not knowing that Burt thinks he is going to die, his wife says to him "At least now we have time."  The look on Coleman's face in that one moment is devastating.  You can see all of the guilt and confusion as to what he should do, but he is unable to bring pain to her in the little time he thinks they have left.

To my mind, I don't think people are appreciative enough of Coleman's body of work.  But is just my humble opinion.

-----

Dabney Coleman had 179 acting credits to his name in a career that spans 63 years.  Some of his appearances may be small, but his performances are always special.  

He was married twice and is survived by his four children.  One of his children, Quincy, stated, “My father crafted his time here on earth with a curious mind, a generous heart, and a soul on fire with passion, desire and humor that tickled the funny bone of humanity.”


I do not know much about Coleman's personal life.  But as an actor, I can only think of the words from Hamlet:

"He was a man, take him for all in all, I shall not look upon his like again.”

Eternal rest grant unto him, O Lord, and let perpetual light shine upon him.  May his soul and all the souls of the faithful departed through the mercy of God rest in peace.  Amen.

Rest in Peace, Dabney Coleman


Friday, May 3, 2024

Film Flash: The Fall Guy (2024)

 




15 words or less film review (full review to follow soon)


Not as clever as it thinks, the movie works because of Gosling's stunts and charisma.

Star rating 3.5 of 5.png

Wednesday, May 1, 2024

Lack of Updates - May 2024

 Dear Reader,

As is common at this time of the year, there may be a bit of a pause on the content of this blog.  Several projects have been converging and my time demands continue to limit me.

So for the next few weeks, you may see only a one or two posts.  But once this current workload passes, we shall return to our regularly scheduled program.  With Summer Movie Season on the way, we will have a lot of films to review.  We also will celebrate this month the 12th year of this blog.

Thank you again for your patience and we will be back soon.


God Bless,

Catholic Skywalker

Monday, April 22, 2024

New Evangelizers Post: Can You Compromise The Right To Life?

                                                                   


 


I have a new article up at NewEvangelizers.com.  

We are now in a presidential election year after the overturning of Roe v. Wade. The question of abortion will be on the ballot in a way that we have not seen in a long time.

As I’ve written about before, the pro-abortion side was preparing for the overturning of Roe in a way that the pro-life side was not. For many on the pro-life side, the end of Roe v. Wade was seen as the final victory in the struggle for life. But this could not be further from the truth.

The struggle is just starting.

The pro-abortion side was busy at work pushing their views through social media and mass media. Abortion, in many mediums, is celebrated and lauded. Any voice in defense of the unborn is seen as a horrible restriction on women’s rights. The Culture of Death wasted no time. This is nothing new, but the pro-abortion side hit the ground running while the pro-life side is playing catch up.

For example, in my home state of Ohio, last fall we passed a constitutional ammendment basically legalizing all forms of abortion. The winning side successfully convinced enough of the voters that Ohio’s laws restricting abortion were too broad. The average voter favors some abortion rights, but not an unlimited one. For example, the overwhelming majority of people believe abortion should be legal in cases of sexual assault.

Because of things that have happened in Ohio, some pro-life politicians have been moderating their political stances. Fearing that standing up for the life of the unborn will cost them votes, they have done the political calculus of saying that they believe abortion should be legal in some cases.

So how is a Catholic to respond to this?

To be fair, this can be an incredibly complex situation and I do not want to make the mistake of oversimplifying it.

However, we must begin with this as our bedrock foundation: killing unborn children is wrong.

Our ultimate goal needs to the the abolition of abortion and the recognition of the dignity of every life.

But how do we accomplish this goal? Can we compromise on our beliefs?

For example, let’s say that in the next election in Ohio, there is a proposed constitutional ammendment that would keep abortion legal except for in the third trimester. Could a Catholic vote for this in good conscience?

The answer is: it depends.

What it depends on is the interior intention of the voter.

If I vote for this hypothetical ammendment because I think that some human life has value and other human life does not, then my motivation is bad.

But if I vote for this ammendment because I see it is a way to mitigate the mass murder of the unborn and save some children, then yes I can vote for it. Oscar Schindler worked with Nazis and gave money to Nazis in order to bring Jewish people to safety away from the death camps. Schindler could not stop the entire Holocaust, but he saved as many people as he could. In the same way, voting for a law that limits abortion partially is a way to save some life.

The ultimate goal must still be to end abortion. Throughout the years before the Civil War, efforts were made to mitigate the spread of slavery. But the abolitionists always held that the ultimate goal was the end slavery forever. It is morally licit for a Catholic to vote for an imperfect law.

But the voting for that law must be done with the understanding that it is an imperfect compromise that is a temporary measure in pursuit of the perfect. Pro-lifers cannot accept a permanent moderation



You can read the whole article here.




Sunday, April 21, 2024

Sunday Best: Summer Box Office Predictions 2024

After going over the movies that are coming out this summer, I always enjoy trying to predict the summer box office for the following year.

Michael Crichton once said that studios spend millions of dollars every year trying to predict box office.  But in the end, it is all guess work.  There is no magical formula and no one gets it right all the time.  


That is certainly the case with me.

In 2016, I got 6 out of 10 right.  By 2017, I improved to 8 out of 10. 2018 was my best year, where I made it to 9 out of 10 and my order of highest grossers was even more accurate.  2019 I did great with the top 7, but the bottom three I had all wrong.  I didn't do it in 2020 because of the pandemic.  2021, my top 3 were all accurate.  If Hotel Transylvania hadn't been pulled, I believe my top 5 would have been accurate.  However I WAY over guessed the appeal of In the Heights and I underestimated Free Guy.  

In 2022, I once again got 8 out of 10, but I only correctly predicted the #2 movie as Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness.  I had no clue that Where the Crawdads Sing would make it to the top 10.

In 2023, I got 7 out of 10, but I didn't correctly predict any in the correct position.



I am going to try again this year.  I may be wrong about my number one and two, but we will see.









1.  Deadpool & Wolverine







The last Deadpool made over $300 million.  The Marvel brand is diminishing, but people still have great enthusiasm and affection for this character.  The fact that the trailers were one of the most watched online and that this film looks like it will be taking potshots at the MCU (not to mention that this is probaly the last time to see Hugh Jackman as Wolverine), I think the demand for this will be high.  If it is even half-way decent, there will be many who will see it multiple times.


2.  Descpicible Me 4




The last movie in the franchise made $370 million.  By the metrics, this should outgross Deadpool & Wolverine, but I'm going with my gut and saying that this will come in 2nd, not first place.  As families are turning away from Disney as a trusted brand, this franchise is looking much more child-friendly.




3. Inside Out 2

 

Uploading: 66190 of 66190 bytes uploaded.


PIXAR has been on a losing streak.  But people have such fond memories of the original that as long as the movie doesn't follow the tone of Turning Red, then this will be a big hit.  It will depend on word-of- mouth

4.  IF



Choosing an original IP for this high on the scale is risky.  But John Krasinski has a good track record of quality.  Ryan Reynolds will be everywhere because of Deadpool & Wolverine.  And this looks like a fun and innocent film that the whole family can enjoy.


5.  Twisters





The orginal made $241 million in 1996, which would be $468 million today.  This looks like it could be a theatrical experience so it my drive people to the movies.  There are no big stars, but it also looks like it could be a thrilling adventure.


6.  The Fall Guy





Ryan Gosling has built up a lot of goodwill and enthusiasm for his turn as Ken in Barbie.  On top of this, the movie looks like an incredibly fun and goofy action-comedy.  People want to have a good time at the movies and this could be that.


7. The Garfield Movie




I'm going out on a limb on this one.  The first movie that came out 20 years go made only $75 million and the sequel made $28 million.  But this looks like a high-quality animation at the time when people are looking for Disney alternatives.  


8.  Bad Boys: Ride or Die




This is another risk.  This is the first big budget movie since Will Smith hit Chris Rock at the Oscars.  But the last film in the series made $206 million.  I think that as the advertising campaign picks up, people will ignore Smith's behavior and go to see this movie.




9.  A Quiet Place: Day One




Both movies in the series have made over $160 million.  But the sequel made less than the original and that is not the trend we want to see.  Because this is a new take on the series, it may be a slightly bigger draw

10.  Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga




I don't think there is as much interest in this as there was when Fury Road came out, but I think that it will different enough from anything out there that it will find an audience.  Fury Road made $154 million and I think this may make about that much.



ALTERNATES


 Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes




I've heard some of my students talk about how they wanted to see that, so there may be interest.




Borderlands




I think this will be terrible, but there is the off chance that it could pull a Guardians of the Galaxy and be unexpectedly good and thus draw a crowd.

Horizon




This could be the mature alternative to all the popcorn fluff.  But it is long shot at best.



Thoughts?

Thursday, April 18, 2024

Trailer Time: Transformers One


This one was nowhere on my radar.  

The concept also is one that never occured to me: Transformers as a silly coming-of-age comedy.  Just from that description, it sounds like a terrible idea.

Transformers has always had a tone of seriousness.  Yes, the Michael Bay movies were full of dumb humor.  But when it came to Optimus Prime, he was grim leader: "Heavy is the head that wears the crown."  In a similar way, Megatron was not one for any kind of levity.  So when the trailer started, I was immeadiately turned off.

But as the trailer went on, I began to warm to the concept.  There are two reasons for this:

The first is that there actually appears to be an intersting story here.  Take the Transformers aspect of it out, and it feels like a classic adventure of the younger generation seeking out new horizons and discovering a great destinty.  The second is that I found myself laughing at the jokes.  

In fact, I think I laughed more in this one trailer than I have during episodes of most modern sitcoms.  

And strangely, I found myself a little sad.  It seems like Optimus Prime and Megatron are good friends with fun chemistry.  But just like on Smallville, we know where this road ends.  

Transformers: Rise of the Beasts felt like a tired offering of a once vibrant franchise.

Transformers One might be able to inject a litter energon into this universe.

Thoughts?