ReasonForOurHope

Showing posts with label Television. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Television. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 7, 2026

TV Review: Lanterns Season One.

 I have to give it more time, but I think Lanterns might be the worst DC TV series ever made.


And I’ve seen Peacemaker.


There are so many problems with this show that it is difficult to know where to start.  I wrote in my review of the first episode that the darker tone could work if the story went to interesting and satisfying places.  


It did not.


As it got worse, a friend of mine asked, “Why are you still watching it?  Is it self-torture?”  I think it’s because at heart I am a Blue Lantern: I hold onto hope for as long as I can.


But hope for this show died along with Hal Jordan.


I cannot review why this how is so bad without spoilers so be warned:

SPOILERS FOR THE REMAINING REVIEW.


It is difficult to say anything about this show that hasn’t already been said, so if any of my ideas are parallel to what others are saying, my apologies.


The most obvious problem is that the show is morally abhorrent.  This should not surprise based on Peacemaker and the work of Tom King.  The “hero” of the story is John Stewart, who essentially becomes a villain.  In fact, everyone in this story is horrible.  The least horrible person is Hal Jordan, who you are supposed to hate.  Hal is presented as retrograde and out of touch.  But just like Archie Bunker, he is the only one who resonates with the audience.  This is in no small part due to Kyle Chandler’s fantastic performance.  But the show goes out of its way to tear Hal down so that it can build John up.


I wrote in my review for the movie Turning Red that the entire movie was written backwards from the punchline.  This means that instead of letting the natural and logical characters grow out of the story, everything is shoehorned into an essential message or point.  You find this at the end of the last episode where Hal’s hologram says to John, “My gut tells me you’re gonna be better at this job than I ever was.”


And there it is.


The whole point of the show was to tell (not SHOW) the audience that John is better than Hal.  


This is a problem because many people love Hal Jordan.  Hal Jordan means something to people.  To the writers, Hal Jordan is just a vehicle that can trauma dump and use as a stepping stone. Tom King did the same thing to Wally West in the comics in the single worst issue of any comic book I have ever read.  And now he has done the same thing to Hal.


To sum up the story:


A manhunter (a shapeshifting violent alien) was brought to Earth by the previous Green Lantern of Sector 2814, Abin Sur.  In mercy, Abin spared the manhunters life and the manhuner murdered him.  The manhunter set up in a small town called Rushville where she made the inhabitants follow her like a cult leader because she could cure all their diseases.  A fugitve named Kate Kane came to Rushville and was saved by the manhunter who made her sheriff and impregnated her with a manhunter baby.  When Hal finds out there are aliens in Rushville, he investigates and his trainee John comes with him.  They find out that the manhunter has a giant stockpile of weapons that work against Green Lanterns.  Meanwhile some other aliens want revenge on the manhunter for killing their planet.  Also, the Guardians of the Universe want John to take away Hal’s ring because he was trained by Sinestro.  Hal decides he can’t trust John and abandons him in a crashed car which later catches fire.  The manhunter (who in an earlier episode had sex with John) saves his life.  The manhunter begins killing the people of Rushville indiscriminately as Hal tries to save them.  When his ring runs out of charge, John tries to take the ring from him.  When the manhunter shows up, John assassinates her with a sniper rifle, takes the ring, but chooses not to be a Green Lantern.


Hal Jordan goes to prison because of the death and destruction in Rushville.  When he gets out, he starts a romance with Kate Kane, who is still sheriff.  He moves back to Rushville where the people blame Hal for all of the destruction and try to kill him.  Kate’s teenage son saves Hal and Hal discovers that he is a manhunter who has broken Sinestro out of prison so that Sinestro could make him a power battery that could kill a Guardian.  When Hal tells Kate, he says that he wants to protect her and her son by leaving Rushville and laying low until they can find a place safe from the Guardians.


Her response to this is to shoot him in the head.


She then calls John Stewart who comes to investigate and discovers everything.  He digs up Hal’s corpse and takes his ring.  We also learn along the way that Hal’s father and grandfather committed suicide, so Hal is broken.  John finds Sinestro, tortures him and takes the power battery.  Kate’s son finds John and beats him up but then tells John to kill him so that he doesn’t turn evil.  John then finds Kate tells her he figured out she murdered Hal, but he doesn’t turn her in because “Hal wouldn’t want that.”  He then tells Guy Gardner to leave Earth and that he is the only lantern for the planet.  And top it off, he decides that the Green Lantern oath is stupid so he comes up with his own (which sounds a lot more like the Sinestro Corps oath).


And that’s Lanterns.


As you can see, John is pretty much evil.  He becomes an accessory after the fact to murder, steals Sinestro’s power battery and bullies away the actual Green Lantern of Earth because he can.  He assassinated the manhunter because he says, without evidence she wanted to die.  He tries to steal Hal’s ring while he is trying stop people from getting killed.


Going back to this point, the manhunter was the one indiscriminately murdering the people of Rushville, but Hal is the one who is blamed even though is the ONLY ONE trying to save them.  When he returns to the town they try to murder him, but that is all swept under the rug until he is actually murdered.


His murder also makes no sense.  If he was saying that he was going to expose Kate’s son to put him in danger, making some kind of threat, then there would be some logic.  But he was literally telling her his plan to save them.  But she was so upset at the idea of having to leave her stupid, violent community that she put a bullet in his brain.  This was not an accident, like the gun just went off.  She pulled it out of the holster, took off the safety, pointed it at his face, and pulled the trigger.  


And because we are not supposed to like Hal, she shouldn’t go to jail.


The writers think they are incredibly clever, but the plot holes are so numerous that the story cannot hold water.  It is even more infuriating because it is clear that the writers think that they are high-minded and sophisticated.  It’s like Prometheus where you had supposedly smart characters constantly doing stupid things.


Why would the murderer bring to town the one man who could figure out you are the killer?  If the manhunter did want to die, why did it go out of the way to use its husband as a decoy to save its own life?  If the Kerry’s son didn’t want Hal to know who saved him, why didn’t he just not show himself to Hal?  If the power ring can cross interstellar distances like nothing, why can’t it take out the handful of satellites that are killing the townsfolk?  Why can’t Sinestro forge a power ring if he can make a power battery, which is much harder to make?


Also, Sinestro is trapped on an island where you can’t swim across the water.  He complains about not being able to leave.  So to be clear, he can forge a lantern power battery, but he can’t cobble together a canoe?  I could go on and on, but this article is already too long.


All of this is so wasteful.  Hal Jordan and John Stewart are fantastic characters in the comics.  They don’t always agree or get along, but they are both heroes.  Nothing about Lanterns is heroic.  


I'm not saying that Hal and John are paragons of virtue in the comics. But the moral relativism that is spread throughout this entire series is so repellant to me as a Catholic. I could put up with the language issues, though to bizarre incorporation of nudity and sexuality is baffling. But above all, the show feels like an inversion of morals.


Going back to Hal, the writers definitely have John Walker Syndrome with him: they want you to hate him, but they are so morally out of touch that he is the only one who makes some kind of sense.  For me, the most outrageous scene was during the mass murder in Rushville, Hal looked completely out of his depths and overwhelmed.  Hal may be reckless, but they wrote him in this scene as incompetent.  He also left John to die in the wrecked car,which makes Hal an attempted murderer.


Honestly, the treatment of John isn't better. The writers mean to elevate him, but instead, his morally compromised view of the world is so bleak that none of the heroism of the comic book version of the character can be found.


The main problem from this show is that the writers don’t care about these characters.  They mean nothing to them.


But even if they had used completely original characters, the show would still be morally repugnant.  That’s what makes this so much worse.  It would be like someone beating you to death with your favorite childhood toy.  There is a deep-seated level of hatred for the DC heroes and their fans that I cannot fathom.  That hate the Green Lanterns, joking how “Green” is stupid so the show is just called Lanterns.  They tried to excuse it as a stupid joke, but it clearly wasn’t.  They disdain everything about the Green Lanterns and want to strip it away and reforge it in their own broken image, even rewriting the Green Lantern Oath.


It is supposed to be “In Brightest Day, in Blackest Night, no evil shall escape my sight…”


But in Lanterns, Day is NIght and evil is seen as right.


These lanterns cast only darkness instead of light.


Sunday, September 27, 2026

Sunday Best: Best TV Shows of the 21st Century (so far)

 Recently, the New York Times posted their list of the greatest TV shows of this century so far.  You can google their choices.

These are shows that began in the 2000's, so Friends and That 70's show are not on there.  Also, they included mini-series as well.  

Of the 100 shows on that list, I would say I have seen only 35 of them, and many of them only a few episodes.  However, there are many on there that should not be on there and many that have been overlooked.  

I decided to make my own list.  I have also decided to divide them between dramas and sitcoms.  The NYT list did not do this, but I think when you compare the two, it is often apples to oranges.


So here is my list of 100 best shows of this century.  I've divided them into REALITY, SITCOM, and DRAMA.

Because the list is so large, there will not be any commentary as to the rationale.  Feel free to follow up later.


REALITY

6. The Floor is Lava

5. Welcome to Wrexham

4. Shark Tank

3. Dancing with the Stars

2. Survivor

1. The Amazing Race


SITCOMS

35. Georgie and Mandy's First Marriage

34. DMV

33. Truth Seekers

32. Animal Control

31. Malcolm in the Middle

30. Modern Family

29. Andy Barker PI

28. Son of Zorn

27. Undeclared

26. The Paper

25. The New Girl

24. Brooklyn 99

23. Bless this Mess

22. Ghosts

21. Schooled

20. The Goldbergs

19. Single Parents

18. Clerks

17. A Man on the Inside

16. Only Murders in the Building

15. Ted Lasso

14. Mythic Quest

13. The Middle

12. Frasier (Reboot)

11. Raising Hope

10. How I Met Your Mother

9. Roseanne (Reboot)

8. The Good Place

7 The Office (UK)

6 Scrubs

5. Parks and Recreation

4. Arrested Development

3. The Big Bang Theory

2. The Office (US)

1. Community


DRAMAS

59. Suits

58. Chuck

57. Cobra Kai

56. Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency

55. Stargirl

54. Locke and Key

53. Obi-Wan Kenobi

52. Will Trent

51. Paradise

50. The Rookie

49. Castle

48. Jessica Jones

47. Agents of SHIELD

46. The Amazing Digital Circus

45. Justice League

44. Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles

43. The Hollow Crown

42. High Potential

41. One Piece

40. The Fall of the House of Usher

39. Bad Monkey

38. The Penguin

37. Death by Lightning

36. Smallville 

35. Presumed Innocent

34. The Pitt

33. Stranger Things

32. Andor

31. Game of the Thrones

30. The Flash

29. 24

28. Daredevil

27. Broadchurch

26. Sherlock

25. The Orville

24. Picard (because of season 3)

23. The Mandalorian

22. Alias

21. Severance

20. Firefly

19. Dopesick

18. Blackbird

17. Arrow

16. This is Us

15. Doctor Who

14. Gilmore Girls

13. Veronica Mars

12. The Walking Dead

11.  Superman and Lois

10. Chernobyl

9. Band of Brothers

8. John Adams

7. Fargo

6. Freaks and Geeks

5. Battlestar Galactica

4. Buffy the Vampire Slayer

3. Breaking Bad

2. Lost

1. The Chosen



Thoughts?




Sunday, September 20, 2026

Sunday Best: Emmy Winners 2026

  


Perhaps I am getting older or more mature or perhaps my tastes are changing, but I don't have the same excitement that I used to for award shows.  I used to look forward to the Golden Globes, the Emmys, and most especially the Oscars.  But now they seem like an afterthought.  I still consume a great deal of media (perhaps too much).  But my desire to see the industry award itself is waning.

My biggest takeaway from watching the Emmys didn't have to do with any of the actual awards.  I didn't think that Marishka Hartigay was a terrible host, but she wasn't very good either.  And as with the proliferation of streaming networks, most of the shows that were nominated were ones that I did not watch.


BIG WINNERS: Widow's Bay

This is a show I do not watch, but it cleaned up that night.  It won a total of 13 wins.  The lead actor Matthew Rhys not only won for this show but for a limited series that night as well.  While I can't speak to how good the show is, I was happy to see Stephen Root win an Emmy.  I'm old enough to remember when he was doing guest spots on the original Night Court and he has been working regularly in television since.  I especially like how he referenced Harrison Ford.  It also like Katie Dipold (the showrunner) is now out of Hollywood jail after writing the 2016 Ghostbusters movie

MICHAEL J. FOX'S SPEECH

As a child of the 1980's I was very moved by seeing Michael J. Fox accept his award.  I loved how he began his speech by acknoledging the award's namesake Bob Hope and ending his speech thanking him.  

TOM PELPHREY'S SPEECH

I do not know this actor, but I was moved by how he began by thanking God for his life and his sobriety.  His speech had the tone of true gratitude, especially when he turned his attention to his family saying they were the crown jewel of his life.  I especially loved how he spoke to his unborn child growing inside of his wife.  It was a very pro-life moment.

HUMOR?

I always wonder who writes the jokes for these shows and how they almost always come to the unfunniest punchlines.  The only standout was John Mulaney who probably wrote his own material.

IN MEMORIAM

I don't know how these awards shows keep screwing up the In Memoriam part of the evening.  Sometimes they leave off names they shouldn't.  Sometimes they choose the wrong song/singer.  But this time, it was the fact that Chuck Norris was left off of the list.  Not only was he a cultural icon, but his show Walker, Texas Ranger was a huge hit that ran for several years on CBS.  


Thoughts?



Wednesday, August 19, 2026

TV Review: Lanterns Episode 1

 

I love Hal Jordan.

While he is not my favorite Green Lantern, what Geoff John’s was able to do with him during his legendary run was amazing and some of my favorite comic stories of all time.

So when I heard they were doing a TV show about him and John Stewart, I was excited.  But then I saw that Tom King was going to be involved.  After witnessing what he has done to some of the greatest heroes of the DC Universe, I became very wary.  In fact, I was so wary that I at first decided not to watch the show at all.  I am so sick and tired of stories that try to tear down he classic heroes that I love.

But I kept hearing so many conflicting things about that first episode from people saying that it was a travesty that ruined the characters to saying that it was a modern day classic.

Finally, curiosity got the better of me and I bit the bullet.  And now I understand why people love it and why they hate it.

And it all comes down to how much you trust the producers of this show.

The story takes primarily the point-of-view of John Stewart (Aaron Pierre).  He is the trainee for the older, reckless Green Lantern veteran Hal Jordan (Kyle Chandler).  To say that the two do not get along is an understatement.  Stewart views Hal as an arrogant, bullish, problem to the Green Lantern Corps.  Hal treats John like he is a child, often calling him "Junior," and constantly criticizing his lack of experience and street smarts.  But things turn when a message tells them to go to a small town in Nebraska where there has just been a mass shooting at a high school football game.  Hal suspects aliens are involved and as a member of the Green Lantern Corps, he investigates with John in tow.  They work in a semi-antagonistic way with Sheriff Kerry Kane (Kelly Macdonald), who is married to Billy (Jason Ritter).  But Billy's father Will (Garret Dillahunt) runs a militia ranch where he tells Hal and John that he is interested in taking out any alien threat.

That is as far as I will get without spoiling anything.  There will be spoilers later on in this review, but I will hold off for now.

There were a lot of things about this show that I enjoyed.  The directing was excellent, very atmospheric.  People have been comparing this to True Detective, but I would say it had a stronger kinship to No Country for Old Men.  There was a strong sense of isolation and alienation.  The ring effects are used sparingly, but when they are, they look great.  I was also surprised by how much I enjoyed the dialogue.  Both Hal and John come off as smart while at the same time having completely differing and polarizing voices.  There is a great scene where Hal is interrogating someone he thinks is an alien and the dialogue is deceptively clever.

But my favorite thing about the show so far are the performances.  Pierre and Chandler spark off of each other completely.  John is a military man, used to taking abuse from superior officers, so he holds discipline while seething inside.  Jordan is weary from decades on the job.  He resents John as an upstart that he thinks could replace him.  Watching them have to work together while dealing with these complicated issues was fascinating.

Having said that, the show has problems, some of which I will address in the spoiler section.  One of the issues is a stylistic choice.  This is a very HBO-y show: it has a lot of gratuitous language, sex, and it promises some graphic violence.  I always find this to be a bit off-putting, especially in this context.  The darker tone works for things like Watchmen or Logan.  But this is not what I would want in a Green Lantern series.  As a teacher, I've noticed how some teens revel in using vulgarity because it is an immature way to feel mature.  I get that same vibe from this show.

And while the dialogue is fairly sharp, I'm not sure that it's themes are.  It is still early, but Will seems like a thinly veiled knock on people who identify as MAGA.  I'm not against stories having a political bent, but I find that when they fall into political allegory, the writing gets very lazy.

The other big problem is that they don't get Hal Jordan right.  I'm one of the few people who really like the 2011 Green Lantern movie.  It wasn't perfect, but they got a lot right about a young Hal Jordan.  And while there is precedent for a more cynical Hal in the comics, this goes against the work that DC has put into the character over the last 15 years.  It would be like making a movie with Thanos and having him be a Spider-Man villain who rides in his Thanos Helicopter (see Spidey Super Stories #39).  It seems wasteful to tear down a character that they've spent so long building up.

But are they actually tearing Hal down?  

This is where the trust factor comes in.

SPOILERS FOR THE REST OF THE ARTICLE

The episode ends in a flash forward 10 years from the main story where Kerry shows John that Hal has been murdered.  IF this actually is Hal, then I have no faith that this story will honor him in any way.  I am incredibly dubious that they will right the ship because one of the main people involved in this show is Tom King.

King is famous for taking established DC characters and wiping his nose with them.  He wants to write about depression so he makes Mr. Miracle hopelessly depressed.  He wants to write about war crimes so he decides to make Adam Strange a war criminal.  He wants to write about PTSD so he writes the absolute worst comic every written about Wally West.  I think that the evidence is clear that King does not care about the characters as persons but as vehicles for his themes.

And this is not a small thing when you are dealing with characters with whom readers have had a relationship for decades.  If you don't trust the producers to care about Hal, then you will assume the worst.

Now, there is a way that all of this can be made right.  However, the problem with mystery shows like this is that the fan theories tend to be much better than the actual resolutions.  Just look at the response people had to the finale of Stranger Things.  But there is a way that this could all turn out great in the end.

Throughout the show, Hal keeps telling John "My gut is never wrong."  It is an arrogant statement, but it is one that fits Hal's intuitive nature.  In the previews for the upcoming episodes, we are told that the Manhunters will be a major part of the story.  It is said of them that they can shapeshift to look human.  One of the ways that the show could be redeemed is if the dead "Hal" is really just a Manhunter and Hal has gone into hiding.  But that is not the twist that would make this story great.

At the beginning of the show we see that as a child, John and his military father had some kind of obsession with Hal.  John's father tried to make him fearless.  One of the ways he does this is by shooting apples off of John's head to see if John flinches.  As an adult John calls his father to complain about Hal, but his father talks about how they trained for this time.  Here is the my theory that would make the show work:

John's father is a Manhunter.

If John's father is a Manhunter, then we see that he has trained his son to be fearless so that he could infiltrate the Green Lantern Corps.  And all the outward evidence points to John being the ideal Green Lantern, Hal's gut tells him something is wrong.  This would validate Hal's seeming paranoia.  And you would not need to make John a villain.  This could be thematically strong where he has to stand up to his tyrant father and take possession of the ring not for his father but for himself.

Will they do this?  

My guess is that they will not.  Like I wrote earlier, it comes down to faith in the producers.  And with Tom King on their staff, I have no reason to believe that they will honor Hal.  And it is a shame if they think that they need to denigrate Hal to lift up John.  John Stewart is a great character all on his own.  I don't know why modern movie and TV writers think that in order to build up their own heroes that they have to tear down the ones who came before (e.g. Luke Skywalker).

I am curious enough to still follow this series to the end.

But I'm afraid that this could be a headlong journey into Blackest Night.


Sunday, May 10, 2026

Sunday Best: Top 5 Karl Urban Performances

File:Karl Urban 1.jpg


 In honor of Mortal Kombat II coming out, I thought I would take a look back at Karl Urban's career and talk about his best performances.


Urban is an excellent actor who I don't think has ever really gotten his due.  He should be an A-lister with his talent and charisma.  I find that he elevates everything that he is in, especially his most recent work.

So here are his top 5 performances.  To be clear, I am not saying that these movies or shows are good or bad.  Some of them are amazing and some are awful.  But Urban is fantastic in all of them.  


5. Eomer - The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King

While he does not have nearly as much screen time as much of the cast, he carries with him a seething anger at the injustice happening to Rohan while maintaining a powerful presence and strength.  In the extended edition, it was very powerful to see how that stoic exterior broke down at the sight of his injured sister.  



4. Johnny Cage - Mortal Kombat II

He is the heart of this film.  A reviewer recently said that his Johnny Cage is the Jack Burton of this movie and that fits perfectly.  He is funny and charming in every scene, using all of his charisma to light up the scenes he is in.


3. Butcher - The Boys

undefined

I really don't like this show at all.  I dropped out in season 1 because of the content.  But that is not a reflection of Urban's performance which is excellent.  He is ostensibly a protagonast, but he has all the characteristics of a villain.  And that edge is something he constantly plays with so that the audience doesn't quite know what to make of him.


2. Dr. "Bones" McCoy - Star Trek, Star Trek: Into Darkness, Star Trek Beyond.

A Monochrome image of the USS Enterprise, a starship, traversing through space, through a white background. The tagline on top reads "The Future Begins".The poster shows the USS Enterprise falling towards Earth with smoke coming out of it. The middle of the poster shows the title written in dark gray letters, and the film's credits and the release date are shown at the bottom of the poster.USS Enterprise flying through the universe, with the film's title in the middle, and the billing block below.

His impression of DeForrest Kelly is spot on with his cadence and mannerisms.  But if that is all that it was, it would only be an empty impression.  Instead, Urban gets at the heart of the character so that you really feel how he sees and feels about the world.  My favorite moment is in Star Trek Beyond when he says that at least he won't die alone.  But then Spock gets beamed away and there is this wonderful frustration and sadness and resignation when he responds by saying, "Well, that's just great!"


1. Judge Dredd - Dredd

A futuristic police officer in armour and a helmet holding a gun is almost submerged from darkness. Behind him is the tagline "Judgment Is Coming".

One of the great things about this performance is its degree of difficulty.  Most of his face is covered for the entire movie.  Some of the most important acting tools are taken out of his arsenal.  But he gives us the best onscreen version of the character with his amazing control of voice and body language.  If it was not for Urban, this movie would not be nearly as good as it is.  After this, I thought he deserved to be a star, and I maintain that I am not wrong.


Thoughts?

Sunday, February 15, 2026

Sunday Best: SuperBowl Ads 2026

  While I've come to enjoy football more over the last few years, the main draw of the Super Bowl for me has always been the commercials.


This year I wasn't horribly impressed.  I don't think any of them will make a lasting cultural impression.  But these are my thoughts:


Best Trailer:  THE ADVENTURES OF CLIFF BOOTH

I love Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.  I don't think that this one is going be as good, but I found myself excited to see Cliff Booth again.


Weirdest - LIQUID IV

Singing toilets.  I don't know how that cannot be weird.



Most Emotional - #1 LAYS

These generational commercials always get me.  As I've gotten older and feel the passage of time, this little movie about the passing on of a legacy, not just of a farm but of love, was moving.


Most Emotional - #2 REDFIN ROCK MORTGAGE

I know that this was a bit manipulative, but it touches on the alienation you feel going to a new neighborhood, but the strength and comfort you feel when you find your community.

Favorite Commercial - Dunkin

Readers of this blog know what a big Affleck fan I am.  As soon as I saw him dressed like Will Hunting, I was busting up laughing.  I also love the nostalgia of all the classic '90's actors/characters, including Jasmine Guy  to fill out the cast.  It's such a wonderfully dumbed down and overly commercialized satire of the movie that I watched it several times.


All of these are my own subjective feelings.  What are your thoughts?

Sunday, January 4, 2026

Sunday Worst: Bizarro Awards 2025

 


 My good friend the Doctor said that I should do a parallel list to my Kal-El Awards that reflect to worst in pop culture from the year.  He suggested that I call them the "Lenny Luthors" after the horrible Jon Cryer character from Superman IV: The Quest for Peace.  The rational for choosing Lenny was that "he is terrible in every way that Superman is awesome."


I liked the idea, but I thought instead of Lenny Luthor we would name the awards after the true opposite of Superman:

Bizarro.


Bizarro is the anti-Superman, literally.  He even maintains speech patterns that are the opposite of what he means.  "Good-bye, me am not Bizarro.  Me like you!  Live!"  said by Bizarro actually means "Hello, I am Bizarro.  I hate you! Die!"

So since Superman is my mark of excellence.  Bizarro will be my mark of utter awfulness.   Unlike the Kal-El awards, these will be focused mostly on movies.  The reason is that serialized work like television and comics require a longer time commitment in order to understand the material.  You may have to watch a show or read a comic for several months before you discover if it is truly bad or good.  It took me a few episodes to understand the logic behind Vincent D'Onofrio's performance in Daredevil.  The investment of time and/or money also precludes a lot of unnecessary sampling, so my exposure to bad material is a bit less.

With a movie, you can have a complete understanding of the product after 90-180 minutes.  So I only have two TV categories:


-Worst TV Show I Stopped Watching
-Worst TV Show I Still Watch

In both of these cases I will be giving my critical condemnation of shows about which I have some significant experience and thus have a basis for calling them critical failures


So now, here are the Bizarro Awards for movies this past year.  (based on the movies I have seen).


WORST MOVIE



A Minecraft Movie






A number of movies this year were boring or unenjoyable.  But it is a rare movie that has me actively hating it.  And that is the case with A Minecraft Movie.

Now you could make the argument that this movie wasn't meant for me and fair enough.  I am too old for the Minecraft craze so many of the film's inside jokes are lost on me.  But the movie feels like it is constantly talking down to me.  Throughout the whole film I felt the movie saying: "You are so stupid that I am going to spoon-feed you ever part of this inane plot with unfunny jokes and flat characters sprinkled throughout."  

A movie like this can work through suspension of disbelief.  But everything part of this movie felt so artificial that I was counting down the seconds until it was over.






TOP TEN WORST MOVIES
10. Spinal Tap II: The End Continues
9. Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere
8. The Running Man
7. Roofman
6. The Life of Chuck
5. Wake Up, Dead Man
4. Eternity
3. Marty Supreme
2. Snow White
1. A Minecraft Movie


WORST ACTOR

Jack Black- A Minecraft Movie






Jack Black is very talented and he has had a longer career than many funny men.  But this performance in A Minecraft Movie is barely a performance.  It feels like he stepped into a Saturday Night Live sketch and just kept vamping long after the joke stopped being funny.


WORST ACTRESS

Rachel Zegler- Snow White









She was so horribly miscast in this movie.  I try very hard to separate an actor's real-life persona from the performance.  For example, I was a bit offput by Cynthia Erivo's press tour interviews, but her performance in Wicked last year earned her my Best Actress award.  But I cannot tell if I've let Zegler's personal affect my review.  Whereas Snow White as a character is supposed to be humble, sincere, and kind, Zegler comes off as condescending, arrogant, and cynical.  As she approaches the evil queen's castle towards the end, she is supposed to be projecting heroic confidence, but I can only see haughtiness.



WORST DIRECTOR

Kyle Newacheck- Happy Gilmore 2







I have to say this isn't to say that he does a terrible job, it's just that I cannot tell what difference he made in the movie.  The jokes, the gags, the setups all feel very generic, even when they get a laugh out of me.  But the pacing went on too long and it couldn't hit the sweet tones it needed for its emotional heart.


WORST SCREENPLAY

Mike Flannagan - The Life of Chuck





From my review: WARNING - SPOILERS


 

The movie deals with two high concept ideas: 

1. "I contain multitudes"

2. The Mystery Room of Death

Maybe if the movie had focused on one or the other, it would have worked.  But these two things to do not go together and they really have nothing to do with each other.  They never converge in anything close to catharsis.

Regarding the first idea, this comes from a time when young Chuck listens to his teacher read a Walt Whitman poem where he says "I contain multitudes."  This means that every person that Chuck has ever encountered or imagined exists in some way inside of him.  That's what the entire first act takes place in Chuck's mind.  Marty, Felicia, and everyone else are living in a universe of Chuck's mind.  Throughout the next two acts, the people of of the first act can be seen as background characters.  The movie is saying that when you encounter anyone, you make a little version of them inside of you that lives out an entire life.  But Chuck is dying of brain cancer.  The words, "Thanks, Chuck.  39 great years," are words that his wife (Q'Orianka Kilcher) says to him in his last moments.  The universe is ending because of Chuck.  

The Mystery Room of Death is about the locked room in his grandparents' house.  This movie is based on a Stephen King story and this is the most Stephen King-esque element.  The grandfather has a locked room where he sees people's deaths.  You learn this slowly over the course of the movie, but Chuck's curiosity gets the better of him in the end.  After both of his grandparents are dead, he goes into the room and sees himself dying from brain cancer.  He resolves to live life to the fullest and ends by saying, "I am wonderful.  I deserve to be wonderful.  And I contain multitudes."  

And that is where the movie ends.

This is supposed to be an uplifting message about seizing the day.  Instead, it reminds us that the multitudes in Chuck's mind end their existence in meaningless abject horror and then blink out of existence for no purpose.   There is a subtle implication that this is happening in all of us or that we ourselves might be part of that multitude inside someone's mind.  Rather than being life-affirming, it points us to the meaninglessness of life.  It implies that we are not beings of purpose and substance but random, purposeless chance.  

The characters in the first act are given no resolution.  Their existence is given no greater meaning by learning about Chuck's life.  In fact, Chuck's cancer itself plays out like a cruel, nihilistic joke.  The fact that Chuck knows he is going to die has no bearing on anything that happens in the entire story.  Does he live life to the fullest?  I mean... maybe?  We know he has a wife and child so that is something important.  But we never really get to see his life outside of his childhood and the one day he danced.  He doesn't seem all that happy as an adult, so I don't know what the ending is supposed to be saying.  

Notice too how the Mystery Room of Death adds nothing to the first act and the characters that you care about.  If Chuck knows his death or doesn't, it makes absolutely no difference.  The two ideas are so wildly unconnected that it feels like the movie would have been better served if they had taken one out and focused on the other.

And it's not that the movie had to find a super-fun-happy ending for the Act One characters.  But the movie never pays off its narrative debt.  What I mean is that it gives us characters to empathize with who are going through a crisis.  The story owes it to us to give us a proper resolution (even if it is an ambiguous resolution).  Instead, it leaves them in total darkness and expects you to forget about their fate by the time the movie ends.  It expects you to say, "Well, they weren't really real, so it doesn't matter."  But the movie made them real in Act One and you cannot remove their personhood from the audience.

The movie wants to say something about how life is about the moments of wonder.  And while that is absolutely a part of the magic of life, it ignores the need for purpose and meaning in order to make life worth living.

In the end, I honestly don't know if this was an intentional bait-and-switch, where we are promised It's a Wonderful Life and are instead given Melancholia or if the film makers honestly don't understand the nihilism that is poisoning their supposed optimism.  

Either way, I'd recommended avoiding The Life of Chuck.



 (See the above on WORST MOVIE OF THE YEAR)



MOST ANTI-CHRISTIAN MOVIE

Wake Up, Dead Man







From my review:

I am conflicted about this movie because it has one of the best priests I've seen in movies recently, but it also has one of the worst priests and some of the worst Catholics I have seen.  Fr. Jud is accused of murdering Monsignor Wicks.  Fr. Jud is kind, patient, and speaks about the love of Jesus in a way that does not ring false.  Monsignor Wicks is basically a stereotype of Donald Trump in clerics, who embodies every conceivable wicked stereotype that people have about priests.  But Fr. Jud is the opposite.  At one point in the story as he is trying to get information to help clear his name, the random woman on the phone is going through a spiritual crisis in the family.  I was so so moved when Fr. Jud stops everything to counsel the woman and pray with her over the phone.  It was such a fine moment of priesthood on film.  

But the movie does not know how the Catholic church works, especially in the area of the sacrament of confession.  And director Rian Johnson seems to take too much glee in the destruction of sacred images and objects while his main detective Benoit Blanc trashes the Catholic Church and faith in general.  




MOST MORALLY OFFENSIVE

Wake Up, Dead Man









(see MOST ANTI-CHRISTIAN MOVIE)





WORST TV SHOW I STOPPED WATCHING

Stumble




I want to be fair to this show because I only saw one episode.  But there are so many shows out there that if you do not grab me at the beginning, I don't want to invest the time watching.  It wasn't terrible, but it was a little off-putting with few characters to like.





WORST SHOW I STILL WATCH

Saturday Night Live





(Below are my comments from mostly previous years, but they still apply to this year)

I still hold out hope that in 90 minutes of television there may still be at least 5 minutes of good humor.  But it takes a lot of endurance through horrible sketches to come across a gem like "Crucible Cast Party" or the the Nate Bargatzee George Washington sketches.

Every once in a while there is a sketch that is actually insightful and funny, like the Game Show "Republican or Democrat?"  But most of the time I watch the sketch for the first minute and a half until I find out what the gag is.  Most of the time it is a miss, rather than a hit.

Political comedy is tricky, unless you are only looking to find the funny.  Johnny Carson was the all-time king because he made fun of everyone and everyone from all sides of the aisle could laugh at their own political party.  But if you get a sense that one side is being mocked over another, a lot of that good will is lost.  And since SNL tends to lean heavily into its politics, this makes it a slog to watch.


Thoughts?

Monday, December 29, 2025

Catholic Skywalker Awards: Best in Television 2025

  With 2025 coming to a close, it is time for us to choose what the best entertainment of the year was.  And just as the Academy Awards have their "Oscars", so too the Catholic Skywalker Awards have their "Kal-El's"




To reiterate:  the reasons for choosing a Superman statue as it's award, and not something from Star Wars are 3-fold:

1.  The Catholic Skywalker Awards will cover movies, television, and comic books.  Superman is an icon for all three.
2.  The pose he has here, revealing his inner hero, is symbolic of the revelation of truth and beauty that we should find in all good art.
3.  It's a statue I actually own, so I can use this photo on my blog.



And now we here at Catholic Skywalker would like to celebrate the best in Television this year.

There are a lot of wonderful (so I'm told) programs out there that, unfortunately, time has not permitted me to see such as  Pluribus (I only was able to watch one episode) or Reacher this year.


Shows we watch:

DRAMACOMEDYREALITY
Will TrentGoing DutchDancing with the Stars
ParadiseGeorge and Mandy's First MarriageSurvivor
High PotentialThe PaperThe Amazing Race
The ChosenDMVWelcome to Wrexham
Cobra KaiOnly Murders in the BuildingThe Floor
SeveranceA Man on the InsideThe 1% Club
The RookieSNLOn Brand
Poker FaceAnimal ControlCelebrity Weakest Link
PluribusSt. Denis MedicalWhat's in the Box?
AndorSimpsons
Sheriff CountryTumbled
The PittMythic Quest
Suits LA
Stranger Things


DISCLAIMER:

More so than in years past, it has been difficult to find television shows that are not morally compromised.  This is not a new problem.  Television throughout the years has portrayed and promoted lifestyles that are contrary to the Gospel.  Shows like Cheers, Night Court, Friends, The Big Bang Theory, etc have characters living in immoral ways without addressing that context.  This is especially true of the comedies.  In drama, you can deal with the complexities of human sin in a more ambiguous way than in the modern comedy.

That does not mean that just because a show has good morals that it is therefore a good piece of art.  But a show with bad morals makes the show less artistically excellent.  In fact, there are many people who will not engage with any of these shows because of their content.  I am someone who does engage with the content.  Particularly in the area of the sitcom, my choice of the best of the year is not something that excuses the content.  It is a statement of the shows excellence in comparison to the other shows in the category.  And as I said, almost every show has something that is morally compromising.  Therefore, keep that in mind when I am awarding the shows.

Best Drama:
Severance





This show could easily fall apart as "mystery box" show.  This is where there is a high-concept hook in the beginning that eventually goes nowhere.  This show is only in season 2, so the eventual payoff could be a let down.  But this second season was fantastic (with only one bad episode).

The season begins from Innie Mark's perspective, having just come back to the severed floor after spending time in the outside world.  Being trapped into his perspective helped lock the audience in to his dillemma of not knowing what is real and false.  This narrative device of forcing you take the character's perspective is one of the things that bonds you to them and drives the story.

But two things make this show work so well: the intellectual and the emotional.  Sometimes shows emphasize one over the other, but this show does a fantastic balance of both.  The show makes you stretch your imagination and perspective.  In an episode where the innies are out in the woods, one of them is freaking out because he sees the sky for the first time and says, "There's no ceiling!"  The show also offers you a number of unexpected ethical questions.  For example, when a woman begins to fall in love with the innie version of her outie husband, is that infidelity or not?  If someone is a bad person as an outie but a good person as an innie, does at least part of them go to heaven.

All of this is great, but the show pulls you in with such a strong emotional hook, especially for Mark.  Both the innie and outie versions are in such a state of desperation and emotional struggle that your heart breaks for both versions of him.  This is true all the way to the very last scene of the season where you are filled with so many contradictory emotions that you feel like you are going to explode.

As I said, the series could end up being a shaggy dog story.  But as of now, I am still completely hooked and desperately want to know where the story will end.

Runners-up
-The Chosen
-The Pitt
-Andor
-Cobra Kai







Best Comedy
A Man on the Inside




For the second year in a row, this is the best comedy on television.  There are a number of reasons for this.

First of all, the comedic performances are great.  Veteran actors like Ted Danson and Mary Steinbergen are at the top of their game, making it look easy.  The story brings you in with an intriguing mystery.  The story has nice twists and turns while making great comedy from the feeling that the modern world is passing you by.

But above all, when the show is over, you just feel better.  I know this may sound like a simply and modest reward, but it should not be overlooked.  While awkward comedy, biting satire, and slapstick all of their place, there is something special about watching a show where you become quickly endeared to the characters and enjoy spending time with them.  

And as I am getting older, I am beginning to appreciate more and more the feeling that life still has great joy, adventure, and value even as we age.



Runners-up
Mythic Quest
Georgie and Mandy's First Marriage
Simpsons
Animal Control


Best Actor in a Drama
Adam Scott - Severance





Adam Scott's performance has been strong for the entire series.  This year, he showed even more range and depth than I have ever seen in him before.  This is especially true as his innie and outie have a "conversation."  What is amazing about that performances is that they are so clearly two different people but Scott does not cheat by giving one a fake affectation to clearly differentiate the two.  Instead, you get a feel for each character based on the subtle differences in how they look, move, and talk.  

But the moment that stayed with me and still stays with me is a simple line that broke my heart: "But I want to live with you."  It was delievered with such depth of pain and yet an almost child-like innocence that it felt almsot like Scott was taking his heart out of his chest and putting on display to the whole world.  A beautiful performance.


Runners-up
Noah Wyle - The Pitt
Diego Luna - Andor
Sterling K. Brown - Paradise
Jonathan Roumie - The Chosen




Best Actress in a Drama
Britt Lower - Severance





If I had to describe this performance in one word it would be this: layers.

Lower had to play a character who was pretending to be another character who was faking feelings that also became partial real.  She had to work in all of those layers of performance while never giving away the mystery completely so that it was there if you were looking for it, but you couldn't tell if you were reading into the performance too much.

That is such a tricky balancing act while maintaining a true core of emotion.  It would be so easy to play on character completely evil and the other as good, but there is enough nuance in her performance that she lets us see the humanity and flaws in both.

Runners-up
Julianne Nicholson - Paradise
Natasha Lyonne - Poker Face
Genevieve O'Reilly - Andor
Katherine LaNasa - The Pitt





Best Supporting Actor, Drama
Stellan Skarsgard - Andor





One of the things about Andor  that I resisted for a long time was the moral ambiguity that was introduced into the galaxy far, far away.  But one of the reasons that I was able to embrace all of the show's complexity was because of Skarsgard's performance.  His Luthen must live in the duplicity of spycraft while making hard moral decisions.  I know he comes off as cold to some, but what I saw in this performance was someone who hardened his heart to do what he perceived as the greater good.  This season particularly saw his life and usefulness begin to wane, which is something that he always expected to happen.  And despite all of his flaws, Skarsgard let us into his morally complex world and invite us to know him and not judge him.


Runners-up
James Marsden - Paradise
John Turturro - Severance
Elijah Alexander - The Chosen
Kyle Soller - Andor

 



Best Supporting Actress, Drama
Adria Arjona - Andor



This could have been a simple, flat, "strong female character" that actresses like Emily Blunt lament are ubiquitous in the movie industry.  But Bix is given such a rich emotional life.  She is alternately terrified, brave, compassionate, cold, faithless, and faithful all without feeling false or forced.  Arjona never loses her charisma as she drags Bix through the emotional depths, moving us with her strength as she pushes on step by step against impossible odds.  There is not a moment that feels sure for the character and so we want her desperately to make it to a happy ending.

Runners-up
Elizabeth Tabish -  The Chosen
Pattie Harrison  - Poker Face
Fiona Douriff - The Pitt
Maggie Grace - Suits LA


Best Actor, Comedy
Ted Danson - A Man on the Inside










Danson continues to make this one of his most endearing characters and that is saying a lot.  His Charles Nieuwendyk is this wonderful combination of exceedingly brilliant and obliviously clueless.  Forty years ago, he may have been a suave Sherlock Holmes.  But with his age, he feels almost like a time traveler who has come to a distant, exotic future.  

While this year he did not have to go to the emotional depths of last season, Danson continues to draw you in with comedic and dramatic skill.  His character is almost Chestertonian in his delight at the adventure he is on.  That isn't to say he plays him like an idealized innocent.  Danson lets us laugh at him and with him as he begins to navigate the complexities of new relationships.  But Danson is so charming that I will continue to watch him should the show return for another season.

Runners-up
Rob Mac - Mythic Quest
Montana Jordan - Georgie and Mandy's First Marriage
Joel McHale - Animal Control
Martin Short - Only Murders in the Building

Best Actress, Comedy
Charlotte Nicdao - Mythic Quest



Nicdao's Poppy Li is one of the most high-strung characters I have ever seen on television.  She plays her with all of her flaws in a way that could almost repulse you.  She captures so well the self-centered nature of so many of those with the artistic temperament.  But Nicdoa infuses Poppy with enough vulnerability and humanity to keep you hooked, even through all of her tantrums and hysterics.  Nicdao lets us see the vulnerable core of Poppy not just for dramatic effect, but especially for the comedic payoff.  


Runners-up
Taylor Misiak - Going Dutch
Selena Gomez - Only Murders in the Building
Chelsea Frei - The Paper
Emily Osment- Georgie and Mandy's First Marriage



Best Supporting Actor, Comedy
David Hornsby - Mythic Quest




Hornsby has been brining his A-game to his character of David Brittlesbee on Mythic Quest for all four seasons.  This year he pushed his character even more by making him simultaneously sympathetic, pathetic, and hysterical.  His frustration at working with those with artistic temperaments is incredibly relatable as he tries to bring some kind of practical perspective to insane plans, all the while getting flummoxed by how everyone walks over him.  He is a man with no backbone who cannot understand why he is a doormat.  Hornsby lets us laugh at him while also feeling for his every hurt feeling.


Runners-up
Danny Pudi - Going Dutch
Danny Pudi - Mythic Quest
Will Sasso - Georgie and Mandy's First Marriage
Tim Meadows - DMV



Best Supporting Actress, Comedy
Mary Steenbergen - A Man on the Inside



Steenburgen proves in this season why she has been a popular working actress for several decades.  She effortlessly plays the brilliant, free-spirited love interest of this season.  She is fascinating and frustrating, delivering her lines with her trademark falsetto voice that imply innocence but cover her clever mischief.  Her chemistry with Danson is obvious and natural, but she has a great ability to annoy you without ever repelling you.  And all the while, she remains a suspect in this season's caper so that she plays the character with enough ambiguity to keep you guessing.

Runners-up
Jessie Ennis - Mythic Quest
Rachel Bay Jones - Georgie and Mandy's First Marriage
Grace Palmer - Animal Control
Molly Kearney - DMV





Stay tuned for the Catholic Skywalker Awards for Best Movies of 2025