ReasonForOurHope

Wednesday, February 4, 2026

Trailer Time: The Devil Wears Prada 2


The Devil Wears Prada is a movie that surprised me in terms of how much I liked it.  The characters were more layered than they appeared to be and there is some very sharp writing to be found.  I also like the fact that it was able to draw me into the world of fashion, a world that I normally have zero interest in.

It is also a movie that is comfortable with ambiguities in a way that I like.  Is Miranda a horrible person or is she someone who puts on a hardened persona to do the jab she needs to do?  Is Andy's progression growth or corruption?  These are things that you get to debate with other fans of the movie.

So I am looking forward to this sequel.  I especially enjoy the interactions between Miranda, Andy, and Emily.  The original is twenty years old, but the actors seem to still have the same chemistry.

Thoughts?

Sunday, February 1, 2026

Sunday Best: Oscar Game 2026

 OBJECT: Get the most points!


HOW TO PLAY:  Fill out a score sheet for each category with your choice (who you want to win) and your prediction (who you think WILL win).  

CATEGORIES

1.  MAJOR AWARDS

-Best Picture
-Best Director
-Best Actor
-Best Actress
-Best Supporting Actor
-Best Supporting Actress
-Best Original Screenplay
-Best Adapted Screenplay
-Best Original Score
-Best Original Song
-Best Animate Feature



On the night of the Oscars, give yourself 1 point for each correct guess in MY PREDICTIONS.  If you get a prediction wrong, subtract 1 point.  Give yourself 1/2 (.5) point for each correct guess in MY CHOICE.  There is no penalty for incorrect guesses for MY CHOICE.


For example:
Category

BEST DIRECTOR

-MY CHOICE = Ryan Coogler, Sinners
-MY PREDICTION = Paul Thomas Anderson, One Battle After Another

BEST ACTOR

-MY CHOICE =Timothée Chalamet, Marty Supreme
-MY PREDICTION = Ethan Hawke, Blue Moon

BEST ACTRESS

-MY CHOICE = Kate Hudson, Song Sung Blue
-MY PREDICTION = Kate Hudson, Song Sung Blue

If Paul Thomas Anderson wins Best Director, gain 1 point for a correct guess in MY PREDICTIONS, but no points for an incorrect MY CHOICE  (total points = 1)

If Timothée Chalamet wins Best Actor, gain 1 point, for a correct MY CHOICE, but subtract 1 point for an incorrect MY PREDICTION (total points = [-.5])

If Kate Hudson wins Best Actress, gain 1 points for correct MY CHOICE and 1 correct MY PREDICTION.  (total points =1.5)

If Jessica Buckley wins Best Actress, lose 1 point for an incorrect MY PREDICTION, but lose no points for an incorrect MY CHOICE (total = [-1])


You may NOT make a guess for a MY CHOICE in a category if you have not seen any of the films in the category.  You may, however, make a blind guess for the MY PREDICTION section even if you have not seen any of the nominees.



2.  TECHNICAL AWARDS

-Best Editing
-Best Cinematography
-Best Visual Effects
-Best Sound Editing
-Best Sound Mixing
-Best Makeup
-Best Costumes
-Best Production Design

-Best Casting (new category)


For these, give yourself 1/2 point (.5) for each correct guess in MY PREDICTIONS.   Give yourself 1/2 point (.5) for each correct guess in MY CHOICE.  There is no penalty for incorrect guesses for MY PREDICTIONS or MY CHOICE.

3.  MINOR AWARDS

-Best Documentary Feature
-Best Documentary Short
-Best Animated Short
-Best Live Action Short
-Best International Feature Film


For these, give yourself 1/5th of a point (.2) for each correct guess in MY PREDICTIONS.   Since so few people have seen these, there is no MY CHOICE section.  There is no penalty for incorrect guesses for MY PREDICTIONS.


PARTICIPATION:

Fill out the below score sheet and send it to me.  I will be the designated score-keeper.  You may change any choice up until the broadcast begins.


The winner will receive bragging rights and recognition on this blog.


You can fill out the google form here.


I will publish my selections before Oscar night so that everything is on the up and up.  Usually I would have done so already, but I am still thinking things through.

Monday, January 26, 2026

New Evangelizers Post: Practicing the Presence of God in the Eucharist

                                    


I have a new article up at NewEvangelizers.com.  

When I was in grade school, once a month we would gathering around the Blessed Sacrament in adoration. And when we would go there for our holy hour, my grade-school self would tell you: I was so bored. I would kneel, close my eyes, and count the seconds until it ended.

You have to understand: I was raised Catholic all my life, but the Eucharist was not important to me. My parents would have to drag me kicking and screaming (sometimes literally) to Sunday mass and I was a terror to them for long because I was SOOO bored. I couldn’t wait to get out of there and get back to all of the fun things I had waiting for me back home like my action figures, comic books, Nintendo (Princess Peach wasn’t going to rescue herself!). Eventually I made my first communion and from that point on when we went to mass I would walk up the communion line and the minister would say “Body of Christ,” I would mindlessly respond “Amen.”

I look back on my younger self and I see someone who was in the presence of God, but I had no awareness of it.

Hebrews 12:22 says that we have come to Mount Zion, the heavenly Jerusalem. When we are around the altar, with us are countless angels with all of the souls in heaven. In this room with us are Sts. Peter, Paul, Michael, Joseph, Mary Magdalene, Carlo Acutis, Therese of Lisieux, Francis of Assisi, Maria Gorettie, Joan of Arc, and so many others. And yet, how often do we come here unaware of their presence.

At least, that’s what I was, until I was 17. I made a retreat where things changed. At one point on that weekend, we had a Eucharistic Adoration like I had in grade school. And just like all throughout grade school, I knelt and closed my eyes, and began counting the seconds until it ended. What I didn’t know was that the group I was with were Charismatic Catholics. For those who have never been with the Charismatics, they can be very vocal about their faith. So as we knelt, I was surrounded by people shouting their prayers towards the Blessed Sacrament saying: “Praise you, Jesus, Glory and honor to you, Jesus, I love you Jesus, my Lord and my God!”

I remember thinking: this is weird. I was incredibly uncomfortable as I continued to count the seconds until it ended. But then as they kept shouting their praise and I knelt in silence, a thought occurred to me. I have been Catholic all my life and every time I went to communion and they said “Body of Christ,” I would respond, “Amen.” My thought was this: If I really believed what I said I believed, how could I not be filled with joy in the presence of God?”

And then I opened my eyes and I saw Jesus. I don’t mean I had an apparition. But when I looked at the Host, I was given the eyes of faith and I experienced the presence of God. Faith is gift. I didn’t earn it and I don’t deserve, but it was given to me that night. And that is when everything changed for me. I began to mass every day. It set me on the path that led me to my life as a theology teacher and God willing soon an ordained deacon.

That isn’t to say I became a saint. For those who are watching The Chosen, I love the way it shows the Apostles have a life changing experience by the presence of God, but they still screw up like we all do. But they are continually transformed by being in the the presence of God day after day.

Dr. Peter Kreeft said that the heart of the spiritual life is to practice the presence of God.

God is all around us. He is not only in the church, but He is with us when we leave, at work, school, home… His presence never leaves. But we can ignore it. I did for many years. And even now I can get so caught up with work or home life that I can still forget.

But we go to the Eucharist to help us practice the presence of God. We go to Mount Zion to experience His presence. Even Jesus gave us this model. At least four times in the Gospels, Christ would go up to the mountain to pray. Why a mountain?

Perhaps it’s because on that mountain, He was removed from ordinary life, from all of the crowds and noise and demands of daily life. He could then practice the Presence of His Heavenly Father. The Eucharistic table is our mountain. In this space we are removed from ordinary life, if we allow it. Here we can remove ourselves from the noise and demands of daily life and practice the presence of God.

And if we let it, something amazing can happen: we can let God’s presence live in our hearts. And His presence can give us peace, a peace the world cannot give. His presence can fill us with the love that is the deepest longing of our hearts. St. Augustine said that our hearts are restless until they rest in God. Our lives can change.

One of my favorite stories from the Gospels is the story of the woman with the hemorrhage. She had been suffering for 12 years but she pushed through the crowds in the street to touch Jesus’ clothing and she was healed. I love this story because Jesus was probably touched by hundreds of people in that crowd, but only one was healed. And the difference was faith. She believed in the presence of God in Him.

How many times did I go to receive communion when I was young and received the Body of Christ thoughtlessly, like I was getting a snack in the lunch line? I touched Christ, but my life was not changed. But when I practiced the presence of God, every time I received the Eucharist, my heart is touched by Him.

And here is the wonderful thing: when we experience His presence here on our Mount Zion, we can then better practice His presence when we leave this place. We can better see Him in our friends, family, and co-workers. We can even experience His presence in our work, our chores, and even our crosses. I encourage you to take this experience of God here and practice His presence every day this week. Take a moment every day to ask God to reveal His presence in your daily life.

You can read the whole article here.




Sunday, January 25, 2026

Sunday Best: Oscar Nominations 2026

  

 So the nominees were announced this past week for the 98th Academy Awards.


These awards remain the most prestigious in film.  And while many of you, dear readers, are of the opinion that all awards shows are terrible and should simply be shunned, it is my perpetual hope that Hollywood will reform itself and once again nominate movies that matter.


While there were a few happy nominations, there are a few hopeful signs, but none that make me think that the redemption of Hollywood is just around the corner.  Once again, the elite in the industry will gather together, kick out the homeless from the streets, and congratulate themselves.


The movies nominated for Best Picture are:


The top 10 highest grossers for 2025 are:

A Minecraft Movie
Lilo & Stitch
Superman
Jurassic World: Rebirth
Zootopia 2
Wicked: For Good
Sinners
The Fantastic Four: First Steps
How to Train Your Dragon
Avatar: Fire and Ash

There is 1 movie nominated in the top ten earners of the year.  But once again, a lot of these movies have not been seen by the general public.  After Sinners, F1 is in the top 14, which is respectable.  But after that is One Battle After Another, which is #30.  Maybe this wouldn't be so bad until you consider that the disasterous Snow White remake is #24. 

And I do not mean to say that movies with small box office returns are the only ones that should be nominated.  I thought Horizon: An American Saga Chapter One was excellent and that movie flopped.  But if you look at most of these nominees, the average person will not know them.

And I don't mean that big hits should be nominated.  I thought the highest grossing movie this year was the worst.  On this blog, we are not vox populi, vox dei.  But the point is that the viewing public will be much less interested in this these awards if they haven't seen the movies.




 My own top ten of the year include:
Superman
Fantastic Four: First Steps
David
Wicked: For Good
Song Sung Blue
Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning
How to Train Your Dragon
F1
Novocaine
The Naked Gun


So below are my thoughts on some (not all) of this year's nominees.  

It is clear from the nominations that there is a strong socio/political tone to this year's awards.  This is especially the case with One Battle After Another.  

I also think this year suffered from the strikes that delayed productions.  The delayed effects can be felt in the mediocre crop of films.  But perhaps I'm wrong about this and the poorer quality of this year's movies is simply a result of Hollywood continuing to slide into creative oblivion.

BEST PICTURE

I've only seen Sinners, Marty Supreme, One Battle After Another and F1, so I can't speak much outside of those 4.  Only one of them is in my top 10.  

If the Academy were smart, they would lean on Sinners, which was their biggest hit, even though I didn't care for it.  And it looks like they might because Sinners just made the record for most nominations for any movie in history.

BEST DIRECTOR

As of now, I've only seen Marty Supreme, One Battle After Another, and Sinners.  While I didn't care for Sinners, it was very well directed and I think that Coogler should win.

BEST ACTRESS

Hudson's performance is the only one I have seen and I think that she was the best actress from last year, so I'm glad she got the nomination.  Right now I think Buckley is the front runner.

BEST ACTOR

Though I hated Marty Supreme, Chalamet was fantastic in the role.  Jordan was also very good in Sinners, as was DiCaprio in his movie.  I really think Dwayne Johnson should have been nominated for The Smashing Machine.

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS

I think Madigan is the front-runner because her performance was so odd and creepy.

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR

I don't know why people were raving about Penn's performance.  Maybe I'm missing something.  Benicio del Toro was good and so was Lindo, but no one here blew me away.

BEST COSTUME DESIGN

 Wicked's costume designs were the best this year and they didn't get nominated.  None of these nominees stand out to me.  I really think Superman and Fantastic Four should have been nominated along with Wicked.


BEST ANIMATED FEATURE

I've only seen KPop Demon Hunters, but I like it enough so that I would happy if it won the award

Those are just some of my initial thoughts in some of the categories.  I'm going to try and catch up with some of the other nominees.

Thoughts?

Friday, January 23, 2026

Trailer Time: Masters of The Universe - Teaser



Some people forget that Masters of the Universe was at one point the dominant toy brand of the 1980's, eclipsing Star Wars, GI Joe, and Transformers.  And I have noticed in recent years a resurgence in the vintage toy market for these figures.

So it makes sense that an attempt at a big budget film be made.  And hopefully it will be do better than the one made by Canon films all those years ago.

I will start with the negatives:

I don't like the humor.  For me it falls falls flat, especially the scene where Adam is trying to get the sword and his name plate joke.  I really hope this movie doesn't lean too much into the comedy.

I also wish there were more practical sets and effects.  The overloaded CGI is starting to wear on me a little.

Having said that, I like most of everything else I see.  Like the first Masters of the Universe film, it looks to be partially set on earth where Adam has been sent to hide his real identity, but he is called to adventure back to Eternia.  I think that is a very interesting plot idea.

I like the design of the film.  Masters of the Universe always had a strange juxtoposition of sci-fi and medieval, and the visuals seem to capture that fairly well.  I also like how it jibes with the original cartoon design, whether it's the Sorceress' colors on the bird or the costumes for Man-At-Arms and Teela.

And so far I like the casting.  I need to see more of Nicholas Galitzine as He-Man before I make a decision, but he looks the part, along with Idris Elba as Man-At-Arms and Camila Mendes as Teela.  Not a lot to see in this short teaser, but it feels right.

Thoughts?

Wednesday, January 14, 2026

Film Flash: Is This Thing On

 



  



15 words or less film review (full review to follow soon)



Will Arnett gives an amazing performance in a frustrating film about middle-aged marriage



Monday, January 12, 2026

New Evangelizers Post: The Cappadocian Settlement and the Trinity

                                   


I have a new article up at NewEvangelizers.com.  

Today’s article is going to take a bit of a deeper dive into Church history and theology. Particularly, we are going to look a the Cappadocians and their influence on our theology of Trinity.

When people refer to the Cappadocians, they often mean the early Church fathers from the 4th century located in Central Asia Minor, in and about the region of Galatia. Among these are great saints such as Basil the Great, Gregory of Nyssa, and Gregory of Nazianzus. And these men wrote extensively about the Trinity and helped shaped this central doctrine of the faith.

To understand this, we have to understand the Cappadocian settlement. In the early Church there was a great deal of confusion about the Trinity. It was clear that the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit were divinely connected, but there was difficulty squaring it away with the uncompromising monotheism that Christians inherited from Judaism. If God is Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, does that mean that there are 3 Gods? This was obviously contrary to Scripture. But if you said that the Son or the Spirit were not God, then you would fall into heresies like Arianism, Subordinationism, and Modalism. This led to the Cappadocians, who lived in the Eastern Church in and around modern day Turkey, to come up with a way to talk about God’s oneness and threeness as seen in the symbol.

Part of the issue deals with the language used to describe the Trinity. It was settled by the Church that God is one ousia. This word was synonymous with the word hypostasis, which means substance. It is very clear that God is one substance. The first Capodocian settlement made the distinction between ousia and hypostasis. In this view, ousia would still mean substance. So no matter what, God is still one substance. But the Cappadocians now took hypostasis to mean idiomata, which means the qualities of being a Person. On this view, God is one ousia and three hypostasis.

But the Father is not the Son, nor the Spirit. The Son is not the Spirit nor the Father. And the Spirit is not the Father nor the Son. That is because they are distinct hypostasis. Each has distinct qualities of personhood. For example, the Cappadocians saw that the Father’s idiomata was unbegottenness, the Son’s idiomata was begottenness, and the Spirit’s idiomata was procession. The Father cannot be the Son, because the Son is begotten and the Father is unbegotten. He also cannot be the Spirit, because the Father does not proceed from the Son and Spirit. The Son cannot be the Father, because the Son is begotten and the Father is not. The Son cannot be the Spirit, because He is begotten by the Father, but he is not in procession between the Father and the Spirit. And the Spirit cannot be the Father nor the Son because of the reasons already mentioned.

The second Cappadocian settlement had to deal with Aristotle’s 10 Categories. Aristotle categorized qualities of substances into ten categories. There was one essential property: being. The other properties like posture, relation, etc, were accidental properties. Because being is an essential property, it properly belongs to God. That is why Father, Son, and Spirit are God, who is Being Itself. But the Cappadocians took one of the remaining 9 categories and pointed out that it was also an essential quality of God: relatio or relation. For the Cappadocians, God’s very nature necessitated that each person of the Trinity was in relationship to the other. This, Cappadocians argued, was not an accidental property of God, but an essential one. God is not only essentially one Being, but He is also in relationship to each Person in the Trinity. That is why the Father cannot be the Son and neither of them are the Spirit. That is because relatio requires distinct persons for each Person of the Godhead to be in relationship to.

You can read the whole article here.