ReasonForOurHope

Wednesday, March 25, 2026

New Evangelizers Post: The School of the Cross

                                        


I have a new article up at NewEvangelizers.com.  

Recently I was speaking with a priest and said something that has stayed with me. He said, “Priests are trained to go to the school of the cross.”

He said that it is a constant learning experience for priests to come back to the cross of Christ and to learn from Him. On that cross, we learn what it is to be a priest, to be a Christian.

I would imagine that many of us have been going to the school of the cross during this Lent. We have made certain Lenten sacrifices. Perhaps we attended extra liturgical events like the Stations of the Cross. These things we do in order to draw closer to the cross of Christ and to learn from the school of the cross.

There is a story that St. Maximillian Kolbe had a vision when he was young. He was presented a crown of glory and a crown of thorns. He was told to choose one or the other. Maximillian chose the crown of the thorns. He wanted to have the same crown that Jesus had in this world. He was learning from the school of the cross.

Those who know his story mostly know about how it ends. But Maximillian spent his whole life at the school of the cross. He traveled the world spreading the good news. He founded radio stations to broadcast the Gospel as far and wide as he could. He dedicated his life day after day to God. He picked up his cross and died to himself every day. This is part of the lesson from the school of the cross: if you die to yourself every day, then your final day is just another day that you have to die.

The school of the cross helps remove the sting of death. We see this in Maximillian’s story. I always find it fascinating that all of his great evangelical work is often forgotten. He is remembered most for the thing he did when he was reduced to just a number. Maximillian was sent to Auschwitz. One day, the commandant chose ten men from his barracks to be placed into a room and deprived of food and water until they died. One of the condemned men fell to his knees begging to be spared because he had a wife and child. Maximillian stepped forward and requested to be taken to death in this man’s place. When the commandant asked if Maximillian knew the man whose place he was taking, the priest said no. But Maximillian said that the man had a wife and child, but he did not. Maximillian was taken and locked away with the other without food or water. Normally, the prisoners in this situation would be howling like beasts by the second day. But the guards who witnessed this said that they only heard prayers and singing from that cell. After ten days, Maximillian and few others were still clinging to life. The guards took them and injected them with carbolic acid to kill them.

Maximillian Kolbe learned from the school of the cross. He spent his whole life giving his life away so that he could do it in that final moment. At the school of the cross, he learned that real love is sacrifice.

Pope Benedict XVI made this point clear when writing about Jesus. Our redemption from the cross is not about the blood that was shed per se. If that were so, then it would make God the Father a blood God who desired violence to satisfy His vengeance. But Pope Benedict XVI said that the reason Christ goes to the cross is because it is the only way we would ever truly know who God is: God is love.

And love is expressed in complete self-donation. Jesus on the cross shows us that He is willing to pay any price just to have a chance that we would choose to be with Him forever. And in that love learn how we are supposed to love each other. We are to give our lives away.

You can read the whole article here.




Sunday, March 22, 2026

Sunday Game: Thoughts on Oscars 2026 and Oscar Game Winner

   


So this year we have another Oscars in the history books. 


Below are my thoughts on the night.


THE GOOD

1. Bring Back Conan

 I have always been a huge fan of Conan O'Brien.  I love his sense of silly, self-deprecating humor.  He had me smiling during his entire opening monologue.  Even his digs against those on the opposite side of the political spectrum seemed all in good fun.  I especially liked how he tried to "memify" Leonardo DiCaprio and made fun of how young people don't watch the Oscars anymore.

2. K-Pop Demon Hunters

The Oscars honored one of the rare breakout hits of the year with Best Animated Feature and Best Song, both of which were well-deserved.  In a show where most people have not seen the movies that won awards, it was nice to have something to root for and win.

3. Rob Reiner Tribute

I thought Billy Crystal not only euligized Reiner well (despite his deviation into divisive politics), but he was able to point out the great cannon of films he made.  And then the representation of actors on stage paying tribute to him was very nice to see.

 

THE BAD

1.  The Show Still Drags

I know it is a cliche at this point, but the show goes on way too long.  And I always find it very mean when they cut off some winners and not others.  At least there were fewer meaningless time-filler numbers.

2. Too Much Politics

Oscar ratings have cratered.  One of the reasons is that half of the audience in the US feels targeted and insulted.  This is not a statement of agreement or disagreement with the political positions espoused, but it is an observation about the show's tone.  The regular viewing audience is really not interested in hearing a political message out of entertainers.


3. Who Saw The Best Picture?

With One Battle After Another, we once again run into the problem of very few people having seen the Best Picture.  Last year,  Anora was number 85 on the list of top Box Office draws for 2024, making just a little over $14 million.  This year's Best Picture winner was better at number 30, at $71.5 million.  But compare both of those with 2023's Best Picture Oppenheimer at number 5 and $325 million.

I was not a big fan of Sinners but it was a legitimate hit at number 7 and $280 million at the box office.

Even the critically panned (though a movie I enjoyed) Tron: Ares made more money than One Battle After Another.



So those are my thoughts.  What are yours?


And now, the moment you've been waiting for... the winners of this year's CATHOLIC SKYWALKER OSCAR GAME.


With no clear frontrunner in most of the major categories, scores were generally lower this year, with the lowest score being  -2.9


In third place with a combined score of 3.2... Justin R!

In second place, with a score of 4.2... Catholic Lois Lane!

And in first place with a score of 17.4... me.

I posted my predictions and choices, so everyone can see that things are above board.

This year, I seeing as many of the nominated movies improved my chances.  I bet heavily on One Battle After Another and Sinners.

When grading purely on predictions, the order of the top three winners remains the same (Me = 12.9, Catholic Lois Lane = 2.2, Justin R = 1.2)

When it came to scoring purely on choice, I still won (4.5), But the Garden Stater came in 2nd (2.5), and Catholic Lois Lane and Justin R tied for third (2). 


Thank you to everyone who played this year.  Good luck in next year's game!



Saturday, March 21, 2026

Film Flash: Project Hail Mary

 

undefined
 


15 words or less film review (full review to follow soon)

Touching movie about courage, friendship, and sacrifice wrapped in a sci-fi packageStar rating 4 of 5.png

Friday, March 20, 2026

Trailer Time: Spider-Man - Brand New Day

 

Click here to see the trailer on YouTube


I think of the MCU franchise movies, the Spider-Man series might be one of their best.  Tom Holland has given us a fantastic Spider-Man and No Way Home was the best of the series.

I am very curious about this film.  Instead of dealing with multiversal madness, it seems to be dealing with more street-level issues, albeit still involving super-villains and ninjas.  I love seeing Jon Berthnal's Punisher and will be curious to see if the two actors have chemistry.

There are two shots in this trailer that I really liked.  The first was from inside of Peter's mask and you get his strong sense of isolation.

The second was the one where he stops the sword with his web.  There is no rational explaination for why I liked it except the 13-year-old in me shouted "Cool!"

I am actually a little surprised that there is still such a focus on MJ and Ned.  I thought perhaps Peter was going to get a fresh start, but it seems that this is not the case.  

I'm still not sold completely on the concept, since I don't know what the main story is.  But this franchise has built up enough good will that I am excited to see it.


Thoughts?

Wednesday, March 18, 2026

Film Review: Is This Thing On?

 


Sexuality/Nudity Mature

Violence Acceptable

Vulgarity Mature

Anti-Catholic Philosophy Mature



(I know it's been a while since I did a full review.  I've done a lot of mini-reviews because sitting down and doing a full review takes a bit more detail and effort.  MY time in formation has been eating up a lot of my time that I would normally spend on this blog.  I am going to try setting aside more time to make up for that).

Bradley Cooper is a very competent director.  I think that if he is given the right script, he could go to good to great.  A Star is Born has some great moments, but falls short in the end.  In Is This Thing On? he tells the story of a man meandering through life as his marriage falls apart.  

The problem is that the movie meanders too much with him.

The movie follows Alex Novak (Will Arnett) as his marriage falls apart with Tess (Laura Dern).  Alex moves out of his house to the city.  One night, he wanders into a bar, but doesn't have the cash for the cover charge but notices that people who sign up for the comedy club's open mic get in for free.  Alex goes up and does a set where he vents about how terrible his life is to tepid laughs.  But he finds himself coming back and slowly connecting to the other comedians as he grows in his confidence and skill on stage.  Meanwhile, Tess begins to build a life after Alex.  Things come to a head when she goes on a date and ends up at that club where she doesn't know that Alex is performing stand-up about the end of their marriage.  What happens next is something I will not spoil, but it was not what I was expecting.

One of the things that this movie captures is the awkward family dynamic that happens when a marriage falls apart.  As a child of divorce, there was an odd familiarity to the emotional tone of what was happening.  I remember splitting time between parents in those early days: one living at home and the other living in an apartment.  This film gets that odd balancing act where the children are ping-ponged back and forth and the awkwardness of that persisting relationship between the man and woman.

The best thing about this film by far is Arnett.  This is the best I've ever seen him.  He is an incredibly gifted comic.  But here, you can see his dramatic muscles at work.  What works so well is the confluence between his dramatic and comedic sensibilities.  He gives a performance that is so raw that every joke and quip belies the pain and sadness welling up in his heart.  For that reason, no matter how vulgar he gets or how poor his decisions become, you cannot help but root for him.

Dern is also great in her role.  She lets you see her deep unhappiness and apprehension at starting this new life.  But I couldn't help be horribly frustrated by her character (not her performance).  It is very clear that the separation is not Alex's idea, but Tess'.  And as flawed as Alex is, there is nothing that justifies her throwing away her marriage.  Dern plays all of her conflicting emotions very well, but despite her complexities, I could not helping judging her more than the filmmakers probably intended.  When Alex ends up sleeping with a female comedian, I felt pity for him in his lost wandering.  When Tess goes on a first date, I felt like she was betraying Alex.  Perhaps this double standard speaks more about me than the film, but my wife had the same impression.

Part of the frustration is how dysfunctional all of the relationships are.  Tess and Alex make a big deal about hanging out with their friends, but all of them are so unlikeable that you don't enjoy spending time with them.  It seemed to highlight to me how individual marriages need exterior support from the Church, from marriage groups, and from friendships with other devoted, married couples.  

Admittedly, though, marriages and relationships are messy.  And the movie captures that messiness.  But it also captures how when husbands and wives lose graciousness and forgiveness, the bonds of that relationship begin to dissolve.

This could all work very well, if the middle of the movie didn't feel like it was meandering and not going anywhere.  I began to want the movie to come to its resolution more quickly.  However, the charm of the movie is also in its meandering and exploration of the comedy world.  It was fascinating to look behind that curtain and watch the evolution of Alex's comedy bits.  It actually takes a great deal of skill to write increasingly funny material.

There is much to admire inside of Is This Thing On?, but so much of it gets diluted by the material that doesn't work.  Like a comedian perfecting a joke, this movie could have used a little more refining.





Sunday, March 15, 2026

Sunday Best: Oscar Game and Predictions 2026

   


Tonight are the Oscars.  

This used to be my yearly Super Bowl.  And while the bloom is off the rose, I still watch every year.

Once again, there are not many movies to root for.  In fact, if you read my mini review roundup, you know that most of the movies nominated are pretty awful.

What is interesting is that the race is in a constant state of flux.  At first it seemed like One Battle After Another had a lock on most of the awards and then Timothée Chalamet was definitely going to win the Best Actor Oscar.  But Sinners has gained a lot of momentum and it is a more entertaining movie than either of those other films (except for Frankenstein and F1).


Here are some of my main predictions:

Best Picture: One Battle After Another

Honestly, this is a toss-up between this and Sinners.  Rather than being an artistic judgment, I think this is more about who has the momentum of popularity.  And while Sinners has won more of the recent awards and has the most overall nominations, Sinners was actually a hit at the box office.  I think this is more of a detriment to its chances of winning, since the Oscars likes to give consolation prizes to the movies that Hollywood thinks we should like than the ones that are actually popular.  However, I was wrong about Conclave last year, so who knows?


Best Actor: Timothée Chalamet, Marty Supreme


Last year I went with my gut and said Chalamet was going to win, but I was wrong.  And here I am doing it again.  But as much as I loathed Marty Supreme, his performance is outstanding and it really is the best of the year.  Chalamet proves he can do difficult independet films like this and big franchise like Dune.   I think he deserves this, but Michael B. Jordan might come away with the upset win.


Best Actress: Jessie Buckley

I haven't seen this movie, but all of the smart money is on her.  I also think she is lucky that voting ended before the bomb of The Bride! was released.


Best Supporting Actor/Actress:  Sean Penn/Amy Madigan

Penn was awful in One Battle After Another (don't get me wrong, he is a fantastic actor, but he is given nothing interesting to work with in the material), but he will probably win.  Madigan's twisted villain made and impression.  I didn't recognizer as the lead actress from Field of Dreams, she was so distorted and horrific.  I think her award would be well deserved.


Best Director: Paul Thomas Anderson

Anderson is a very skilled director.  The problem is that the story he directed was not worth telling.  But he showed enough skill and it was popular enough with Hollywood brain trust that I think he will come out ahead here.  As someone who thinks that action movies can be the purest form of cinema, I would like to Kosinski win for F1, but that won't happen.


This is also the last chance to enter the Oscar Game.  Just fill out the chart below.  The winner will get bragging rights and a mention on this blog.  And just to keep everything above board, I am publishing my votes for tonight as well.

Good luck and enjoy the Oscars tonight!

Click the link below to play the game.
Link







Here are my choices so far:

BEST PICTURE - MY CHOICEF1 (Apple); Chad Oman, Brad Pitt, Dede Gardner, Jeremy Kleiner, Joseph Kosinski and Jerry Bruckheimer, Producers
BEST PICTURE - MY PREDICTIONOne Battle After Another (Warner Bros.); Adam Somner, Sara Murphy and Paul Thomas Anderson, Producers
BEST DIRECTOR - MY CHOICESinners (Warner Bros.), Ryan Coogler
BEST DIRECTOR - MY PREDICTIONOne Battle After Another (Warner Bros.), Paul Thomas Anderson
BEST ACTOR - MY CHOICETimothée Chalamet in Marty Supreme (A24)
BEST ACTOR - MY PREDICTIONTimothée Chalamet in Marty Supreme (A24)
BEST ACTRESS - MY CHOICEKate Hudson in Song Sung Blue (Focus Features)
BEST ACTRESS - MY PREDICTIONJessie Buckley in Hamnet (Focus Features)
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR - MY CHOICEJacob Elordi in Frankenstein (Netflix)
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR - MY PREDICTIONSean Penn in One Battle After Another (Warner Bros.)
BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS - MY CHOICEAmy Madigan in Weapons (Warner Bros.)
BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS - MY PREDICTIONAmy Madigan in Weapons (Warner Bros.)
BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY - MY CHOICEFrankenstein (Netflix); Written for the Screen by Guillermo del Toro
BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY - MY PREDICTIONOne Battle After Another (Warner Bros.); Written by Paul Thomas Anderson
BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY - MY CHOICESinners (Warner Bros.); Written by Ryan Coogler
BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY - MY PREDICTIONSinners (Warner Bros.); Written by Ryan Coogler
BEST ORIGINAL SCORE - MY CHOICEFrankenstein (Netflix); Alexandre Desplat
BEST ORIGINAL SCORE - MY PREDICTIONSinners (Warner Bros.); Ludwig Goransson
BEST ORIGINAL SONG - MY CHOICE“Golden” from KPop Demon Hunters (Netflix); Music and Lyric by EJAE, Mark Sonnenblick, Joong Gyu Kwak, Yu Han Lee, Hee Dong Nam, Jeong Hoon Seon and Teddy Park
BEST ORIGINAL SONG - MY PREDICTION“Golden” from KPop Demon Hunters (Netflix); Music and Lyric by EJAE, Mark Sonnenblick, Joong Gyu Kwak, Yu Han Lee, Hee Dong Nam, Jeong Hoon Seon and Teddy Park
BEST ANIMATED FEATURE FILM - MY CHOICEKPop Demon Hunters (Netflix); Maggie Kang, Chris Appelhans and Michelle L.M. Wong
BEST ANIMATED FEATURE FILM - MY PREDICTIONKPop Demon Hunters (Netflix); Maggie Kang, Chris Appelhans and Michelle L.M. Wong
BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY - MY CHOICETrain Dreams (Netflix), Adolpho Veloso
BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY - MY PREDICTIONSinners (Warner Bros.), Autumn Durald Arkapaw
BEST COSTUME DESIGN - MY CHOICEFrankenstein (Netflix); Kate Hawley
BEST COSTUME DESIGN - MY PREDICTIONFrankenstein (Netflix); Kate Hawley
BEST FILM EDITING - MY CHOICEF1 (Apple); Stephen Mirrione
BEST FILM EDITING - MY PREDICTIONOne Battle After Another (Warner Bros.); Andy Jurgensen
BEST MAKEUP AND HAIRSTYLING - MY CHOICEFrankenstein (Netflix); Mike Hill, Jordan Samuel and Cliona Furey
BEST MAKEUP AND HAIRSTYLING - MY PREDICTIONFrankenstein (Netflix); Mike Hill, Jordan Samuel and Cliona Furey
BEST PRODUCTION DESIGN - MY CHOICEFrankenstein (Netflix); Production Design: Tamara Deverell; Set Decoration: Shane Vieau
BEST PRODUCTION DESIGN - MY PREDICTIONFrankenstein (Netflix); Production Design: Tamara Deverell; Set Decoration: Shane Vieau
BEST SOUND - MY CHOICEF1 (Apple) Gareth John, Al Nelson, Gwendolyn Yates Whittle, Gary A. Rizzo and Juan Peralta
BEST SOUND - MY PREDICTIONF1 (Apple) Gareth John, Al Nelson, Gwendolyn Yates Whittle, Gary A. Rizzo and Juan Peralta
BEST VISUAL EFFECTS - MY CHOICEAvatar: Fire and Ash (Walt Disney); Joe Letteri, Richard Baneham, Eric Saindon and Daniel Barrett
BEST VISUAL EFFECTS - MY PREDICTIONAvatar: Fire and Ash (Walt Disney); Joe Letteri, Richard Baneham, Eric Saindon and Daniel Barrett
BEST CASTING - MY PREDICTIONMarty Supreme (A24); Jennifer Venditti
BEST CASTING - MY CHOICESinners (Warner Bros.); Francine Maisler
BEST INTERNATIONAL FEATURE FILM - MY PREDICTIONNorway, Sentimental Value
BEST DOCUMENTARY FEATURE - MY PREDICTIONThe Perfect Neighbor (Netflix); Geeta Gandbhir, Alisa Payne, Nikon Kwantu and Sam Bisbee
BEST DOCUMENTARY SHORT - MY PREDICTIONAll the Empty Rooms (Netflix); Joshua Seftel and Conall Jones
BEST ANIMATED SHORT FILM- MY PREDICTIONButterfly (Sacrebleu Productions); Florence Miailhe and Ron Dyens
BEST LIVE ACTION SHORT FILM- MY PREDICTIONA Friend of Dorothy; Lee Knight and James Dean

Wednesday, March 11, 2026

Trailer Time: Lanterns

CLICK THIS LINK TO SEE TRAILER ON YOUTUBE



I have some thoughts.


I have no issues with a darker take on the Green Lantern storyline.  There is the classic "Hard-Traveling Heroes" story from the 1970's.  And this version of Hal Jordan looks a lot like the one from the early 1990's, where he was going through a mid-life crisis.  This can be fertile ground for some really good storytelling.  And the actors look very good in their roles of Hal Jordan and John Stewart.

However...

I am uneasy about what I am seeing.

First of all, I do not like the vulgarity.  (This is the reason I am not embedding the trailer here on my blog)  Once again James Gunn (who is main person overseeing the DCU) is indulging his darker impulses.  When he gives himself guardrails and tells a story that is not for mature audiences, he creates excellent work like Guardians of the Galaxy or Superman.  But when he lets those working with him to go dark, it all falls apart.  The Suicide Squad was one of the worst movies I have seen.  Creature Commandos and Peacemaker are nihilistic pieces of garbage.  

My fear is that Lanterns is more Peacemaker than Superman.

This is especially seen in the portrayal of Hal Jordan.  He is the quintessential Green Lantern.  But in the trailer, he looks like a cynic, which is not part of his character.  Hal is a lot of things, but he is not cynical.  I don't mind the rivalry between him and John Stewart.  In the comics, they started as more rivals than friends.  But I get the feeling that John is being set up as the "real" hero who is going to replace the tottering Hal.  It feels almost like a Rey/Luke situation.

Again, back the vulgarity, that really does not feel like Hal Jordan.  There is a reason that the power we beware is his light, not his darkness.

The fact that Tom King has a hand in this has me very pessimistic.  King does not understand the characters he writes about.  Instead, he uses characters as vehicles for his themes.  He wants to write about trauma, so he uses Wally West and makes him a murderer.  Or he wants to write about war crimes so he turns Adam Strange into one.  

I have the feeling King wants to write about older, cynical veterans and he is going to use Jordan to do it while ignoring who he is as a person.

Maybe I'm wrong.  But I need to see more before making a decision.

Thoughts