I love Hal Jordan.
While he is not my favorite Green Lantern, what Geoff John’s was able to do with him during his legendary run was amazing and some of my favorite comic stories of all time.
So when I heard they were doing a TV show about him and John Stewart, I was excited. But then I saw that Tom King was going to be involved. After witnessing what he has done to some of the greatest heroes of the DC Universe, I became very wary. In fact, I was so wary that I at first decided not to watch the show at all. I am so sick and tired of stories that try to tear down he classic heroes that I love.
But I kept hearing so many conflicting things about that first episode from people saying that it was a travesty that ruined the characters to saying that it was a modern day classic.
Finally, curiosity got the better of me and I bit the bullet. And now I understand why people love it and why they hate it.
And it all comes down to how much you trust the producers of this show.
The story takes primarily the point-of-view of John Stewart (Aaron Pierre). He is the trainee for the older, reckless Green Lantern veteran Hal Jordan (Kyle Chandler). To say that the two do not get along is an understatement. Stewart views Hal as an arrogant, bullish, problem to the Green Lantern Corps. Hal treats John like he is a child, often calling him "Junior," and constantly criticizing his lack of experience and street smarts. But things turn when a message tells them to go to a small town in Nebraska where there has just been a mass shooting at a high school football game. Hal suspects aliens are involved and as a member of the Green Lantern Corps, he investigates with John in tow. They work in a semi-antagonistic way with Sheriff Kerry Kane (Kelly Macdonald), who is married to Billy (Jason Ritter). But Billy's father Will (Garret Dillahunt) runs a militia ranch where he tells Hal and John that he is interested in taking out any alien threat.
That is as far as I will get without spoiling anything. There will be spoilers later on in this review, but I will hold off for now.
There were a lot of things about this show that I enjoyed. The directing was excellent, very atmospheric. People have been comparing this to True Detective, but I would say it had a stronger kinship to No Country for Old Men. There was a strong sense of isolation and alienation. The ring effects are used sparingly, but when they are, they look great. I was also surprised by how much I enjoyed the dialogue. Both Hal and John come off as smart while at the same time having completely differing and polarizing voices. There is a great scene where Hal is interrogating someone he thinks is an alien and the dialogue is deceptively clever.
But my favorite thing about the show so far are the performances. Pierre and Chandler spark off of each other completely. John is a military man, used to taking abuse from superior officers, so he holds discipline while seething inside. Jordan is weary from decades on the job. He resents John as an upstart that he thinks could replace him. Watching them have to work together while dealing with these complicated issues was fascinating.
Having said that, the show has problems, some of which I will address in the spoiler section. One of the issues is a stylistic choice. This is a very HBO-y show: it has a lot of gratuitous language, sex, and it promises some graphic violence. I always find this to be a bit off-putting, especially in this context. The darker tone works for things like Watchmen or Logan. But this is not what I would want in a Green Lantern series. As a teacher, I've noticed how some teens revel in using vulgarity because it is an immature way to feel mature. I get that same vibe from this show.
And while the dialogue is fairly sharp, I'm not sure that it's themes are. It is still early, but Will seems like a thinly veiled knock on people who identify as MAGA. I'm not against stories having a political bent, but I find that when they fall into political allegory, the writing gets very lazy.
The other big problem is that they don't get Hal Jordan right. I'm one of the few people who really like the 2011 Green Lantern movie. It wasn't perfect, but they got a lot right about a young Hal Jordan. And while there is precedent for a more cynical Hal in the comics, this goes against the work that DC has put into the character over the last 15 years. It would be like making a movie with Thanos and having him be a Spider-Man villain who rides in his Thanos Helicopter (see Spidey Super Stories #39). It seems wasteful to tear down a character that they've spent so long building up.
But are they actually tearing Hal down?
This is where the trust factor comes in.
SPOILERS FOR THE REST OF THE ARTICLE
The episode ends in a flash forward 10 years from the main story where Kerry shows John that Hal has been murdered. IF this actually is Hal, then I have no faith that this story will honor him in any way. I am incredibly dubious that they will right the ship because one of the main people involved in this show is Tom King.
King is famous for taking established DC characters and wiping his nose with them. He wants to write about depression so he makes Mr. Miracle hopelessly depressed. He wants to write about war crimes so he decides to make Adam Strange a war criminal. He wants to write about PTSD so he writes the absolute worst comic every written about Wally West. I think that the evidence is clear that King does not care about the characters as persons but as vehicles for his themes.
And this is not a small thing when you are dealing with characters with whom readers have had a relationship for decades. If you don't trust the producers to care about Hal, then you will assume the worst.
Now, there is a way that all of this can be made right. However, the problem with mystery shows like this is that the fan theories tend to be much better than the actual resolutions. Just look at the response people had to the finale of Stranger Things. But there is a way that this could all turn out great in the end.
Throughout the show, Hal keeps telling John "My gut is never wrong." It is an arrogant statement, but it is one that fits Hal's intuitive nature. In the previews for the upcoming episodes, we are told that the Manhunters will be a major part of the story. It is said of them that they can shapeshift to look human. One of the ways that the show could be redeemed is if the dead "Hal" is really just a Manhunter and Hal has gone into hiding. But that is not the twist that would make this story great.
At the beginning of the show we see that as a child, John and his military father had some kind of obsession with Hal. John's father tried to make him fearless. One of the ways he does this is by shooting apples off of John's head to see if John flinches. As an adult John calls his father to complain about Hal, but his father talks about how they trained for this time. Here is the my theory that would make the show work:
John's father is a Manhunter.
If John's father is a Manhunter, then we see that he has trained his son to be fearless so that he could infiltrate the Green Lantern Corps. And all the outward evidence points to John being the ideal Green Lantern, Hal's gut tells him something is wrong. This would validate Hal's seeming paranoia. And you would not need to make John a villain. This could be thematically strong where he has to stand up to his tyrant father and take possession of the ring not for his father but for himself.
Will they do this?
My guess is that they will not. Like I wrote earlier, it comes down to faith in the producers. And with Tom King on their staff, I have no reason to believe that they will honor Hal. And it is a shame if they think that they need to denigrate Hal to lift up John. John Stewart is a great character all on his own. I don't know why modern movie and TV writers think that in order to build up their own heroes that they have to tear down the ones who came before (e.g. Luke Skywalker).
I am curious enough to still follow this series to the end.
But I'm afraid that this could be a headlong journey into Blackest Night.



