ReasonForOurHope

Monday, February 24, 2025

New Evangelizers Post: Converting The Modern Roman Empire

             


I have a new article up at NewEvangelizers.com.  

Many Christians look at the modern world with despair.

The old Christian culture has faded into the background and a new secular one is on the ascendancy. People embrace the wonders of technology along with the horrors of hedonism. And with each passing day, it seems to many of us that the world is drifting further away from Christ.

I am not here to deny that this is truly happening. Nor am I here to say this is not a major concern.

But what I am here to say is that this modern world has created the conditions for new wave of conversion.

To see this, we have to look back at the first days of Christianity in the Roman Empire.

In those first days of Christianity first spreading throughout the Empire, Rome had connected much of the ancient world. In addition, there was relative peace and prosperity. To be sure, the ancient Rome was always a place of harshness and brutality. But in Apostolic Age, there was enough peace so that there could be free travel throughout the empire. Because of this prosperity, the people were able to spend time with several entertainments and diversions. Once bare survival was taken care of, people could use their disposable income to go to the see the dramas or even the gladiator fights.

But just as material prosperity and plentiful entertainments began to fill up the lives of the people in the Roman Empire, a spiritual hunger began to emerge. The people began to turn to more and more to spiritual practices and philosophical disciplines. We can see a rise in the stoic philosophers in this era, as people look for something more to ground their existence and give it meaning. They hungered less in their bodies, but they hungered more in their souls.

Apostles like Paul understood that spiritual hunger and learned how to feed it. As Paul traveled from region to region, he gave people something that filled their spirits. This is true of all of the Apostles as they went from place-to-place in the Roman Empires spreading the Good News so that the faith spread like wildfire.

And the conditions for another spiritual wildfire are present today.

In our modern day, we find much the same about America. While there are military conflicts around the world, our homeland enjoys relative peace and prosperity. Because of this relative peace, we are presented with several entertainments and diversions. Television, movies, video games, music, and social media fill up the empty hours of the day. I think about my life in America and how I am not constantly worried about invasion or starving to death. And like the Romans, I often throw myself into entertainment and diversions, especially with the internet. But when I do this, I still feel a great spiritual hunger. There are times when I spend a lazy Saturday on the couch eating junk food and playing video games, where I have all of my physical indulgences met, but I feel a sense of waste and emptiness.

The internet has also made the world a much more interconnected place. We may not all be traveling around the world, but we can be connected to almost any part of it. I was once in a discussion with someone about why popular culture in the 70’s, 80’s, and 90’s felt so distinctive, but that in the 2000’s it all feels like it blends together. My friend said that the internet changed it. For example, popular trends would start as regional until they became distinctive. Think about the Seattle Grunge culture that developed in the early 1990’s. Only after it had taken on its distinctive form was it introduced the rest of the popular culture through television and radio as something very distinctive. However, those distinctive cultures don’t get a chance to grow regionally. The internet makes us too connected. As soon as anything becomes popular in one area, it goes viral all over the world.

My point is that just like the Roman Empire we have these specific conditions in modern America:
1. Relative peace and prosperity
2. An abundance of entertainments
3. An interconnected society
4. A deep spiritual hunger because of the above three.

You can read the whole article here.




Sunday, February 23, 2025

Sunday Best: Casting Call - The New James Bond

 


It was recently announced that Amazon would now be the ones who would have the controlling hand in the James Bond franchise going forward.  This means to me that they are looking to capitalize on the brand as soon as possible.

I know that many people have their misgivings about this after seeing what they have done with Tolkien's world in The Rings of Power or seen what another multi-billion corporation like Disney has done to Star Wars.

Regardless, things appear to be moving ahead.  Jeff Bezos even went to social media to see who the people think should be the next Bond.  

I thought it might be fun to through a few ideas out there.



1. Henry Cavill

File:Henry Cavill-2665842.jpg

This is one place where I think vox populi, vox dei.  It seems so horribly obvious that Cavill is perfect for the part.  He is strong, masculine, formidible, intelligent, and classy.  And even people who hated the DCEU and The Witcher tend to agree that he was the best part of those franchises.  Cavill has built up an incredible amount of good will with the fan base.  He would be needed change from the serious-to-dour Daniel Craig Bond.


2.  Dan Stevens

File:Dan Stevens (46801499514).jpg
photo by Gage Skidmore

To play the aristocrat, Stevens has this down after his years on Downton Abbey.  But he has an intesity that reminds me very much of Pierce Brosnan.  I don't think his Bond would be as physically intimidating as Cavill, but he could pull off 007 as someone who is charismatic and cunning: someone who would get by on their wits.


3.  Taron Egerton

File:Taron Egerton by Gage Skidmore (14596254110).jpg
photo by Gage Skidmore

We know that he can play the action scenes, as he did in the Kingsman movies.  But as I've seen recently in his work in Blackbird, he has become a very good actor in his own right.  He would play the part a bit young, but it would be a newer take on the character.


4.  Henry Golding

File:Henry Golding in 2014.jpg
Photo from World Travel and Tourism Council

Okay, this one may be a little out of the box, but hear me out.  If we take the idea that Bond's primary role is that of a spy and that we have a new cold in parts of Asia, wouldn't it make sense to have a spy who was Asian?  There would actually be a lot of opportunities for some exciting and new stories.  Golding is a charismatic actor who demonstrated his charm in Crazy Rich Asians and also his physicality with Snake Eyes.  This could be an intersting choice.


5.  Tom Hiddleston

File:Tom Hiddleston (8464878244).jpg
photo by Sean Reynolds

He has been typcast into the role of Loki, which he did amazingly well.  But Hiddleston can play the heroic part.  He was great as the Henry V in The Hollow Crown and he could pull of the action leading man as we saw in Kong: Skull Island.  He could also bring a bit of the Roger Moore-era mischief and humor, which would be a refreshing change for the current franchise.



Thoughts?

Monday, February 17, 2025

Film Flash: Captain America - Brave New World

 

An illustrated collage of the film's characters.

15 words or less film review (full review to follow soon)

One of the better post-Endgame MCU movies.  Intrigue and action, but a weak third act.




Star rating 3.5 of 5.png

Sunday, February 16, 2025

Sunday Best: Superbowl Ads 2025

 While I've come to enjoy football more over the last few years, the main draw of the Super Bowl for me has always been the commercials.


This year I wasn't horribly impressed.  I don't think any of them will make a lasting cultural impression.  But these are my thoughts:


Best Trailer:  MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE - FINAL RECKONING

Only a few new shots in this trailer, but I have to say that all of the high-flying action has me incredibly excited.


Weirdest - MOUNTAIN DEW

This commercial was so weird that I found myself laughing out loud at how ridiculous it was.  


Most Nostalgic - Instacart

I loved seeing all the old mascots throughout the years.  It was fun to find the very obscure ones from my childhood.


Funniest - Pringles

Like the Mountain Dew Commercial, this was so over-the-top ridiculous, but I couldn't help but find it incredibly funny.  What can I say?  I have a weird sense of humor.


Most Emotional - Google Gemini

This ad really got to me.  At first it was just the usually schmaltzy.  But the last shots where the father is crying in the car and then his daughter hugs him and turns back into a little girl... that got me right in the feels.


Favorite Commercial - Dunkin

Readers of this blog know what a big Affleck fan I am.  I think this was also a really good ad that took a pot shot at the more expensive coffee houses: "How much to wait a half-hour to get my name spelled wrong on the cup?"  I don't know why, but I loved that line.


All of these are my own subjective feelings.  What are your thoughts?

Thursday, February 13, 2025

Trailer Time: The Accountant 2



I really enjoyed The Accountant when it originally came out.  Despite its weak third act, I enjoyed the characters and their arcs.  The main character was fascinating to me with a solid performance by Ben Affleck.

When they announced a sequel, I wasn't very sure.  But I really liked this trailer.

One of the things that this movie does is that it brings three very dissimilar characters from the first movie and it forces them all to work together.  Our three leads shared very little screen time in the first film.  But now, it feels like a real progression of their stories and not another rehash of the first.  I like how each of them brings something very different to the dynamic and I can see some fun interplay between a fed, a hitman, and the Accountant.

This  movie has the same writing/directing team as the original, so it seems like the put a lot care into these characters.

Thoughts?

Tuesday, February 11, 2025

Film Flash: Love Hurts

 

undefined

15 words or less film review (full review to follow soon)

Quan's charismatic "Jackie-Chan-esque" performance carries this charming (though too violent) B-movie action/comedy




Star rating 3.5 of 5.png

Monday, February 10, 2025

New Evangelizers Post: Jubilee Year 2025

            


I have a new article up at NewEvangelizers.com.  

This is the Year of Jubilee!

The Jubilee is an ancient tradition from the times of the Old Testament. It was a special time that occurred once every 50 years. During a Jubilee, all land was returned to its ancestral owners.

In ancient Israel, when you bought property from someone, it did not mean that you owned it permanently. Instead, it was much closer to our modern idea of leasing or renting a property. Essentially this meant that you could not own someone else’s land for more than one generation.

At the Jubilee Year, all the “leased” land would be returned to the family of the one who sold it. In addition to this, any Israelite who had was purchased by another Israelite was to be set free.

The Jubilee was a time of freedom and renewal. It was a way to prevent families from falling into generational poverty due to the bad decisions of their fathers. It was a time when debts were cleared and people could begin again.

Jesus clearly makes reference to the Jubilee when he quotes from Isaiah while preaching at Nazareth. He speaks about “The Year of the Lord’s favor…” (Lk 4:19) which is how the Jubilee is described in Leviticus 25: 10-13. He also uses the language of liberty to captives and letting the oppressed go free. These also are references to the Jubilee.

The Good News of Jesus is that He brings freedom. The Jubilee is a manifestation of that freedom in this world.

In 2025, Pope Francis has called for Jubilee Year. The last Jubilee Year was in the year 2000. It is a tradition that a pope calls for a Jubilee every 25 years. In that year as well, the Jubilee Doors were opened at the Vactican. Pilgrims who travel their are able to obtain an plenary indulgence, which is the full remission of temporal punishment for sin. This is in keeping with the idea of setting captives free in a Jubilee. This time, the captivity is sin.

Pope Francis write “For everyone, may the Jubilee be a moment of genuine, personal encounter with the Lord Jesus, the “door” (cf. Jn 10:7.9) of our salvation, whom the Church is charged to proclaim always, everywhere and to all as “our hope” (1 Tim 1:1). (Spes Non Confundit, 1). This Jubilee Year coincides with the Year of Hope. Pope Francis sees a strong connection between the Jubilee and Hope.

The Jubilee is often accompanied by a pilgrimage. The symbolism points to the hope of reaching the destination of the journey. It also involves a reaching out of our places of comfort in the hope of a better world. Pope Francis writes about the young people of today are crushed by despair. and that “For this reason, the Jubilee should inspire the Church to make greater efforts to reach out to them.” (Spes Non Confundit, 12).

He also writes about how the poor, migrants, the elderly, and the sick need the hope of Christ. We are called to pilgrimage to them and share this hope. Christ can help set them free from the prison of spiritual darkness. Our calling to to pilgrimage to them with that hope.

Pope Francis also has called upon world leaders to emulate as much as possible the Jubilee spirit of forgiveness. “I propose that in this Jubilee Year governments undertake initiatives aimed at restoring hope; forms of amnesty or pardon meant to help individuals regain confidence in themselves and in society; and programmes of reintegration in the community, including a concrete commitment to respect for law.” (Spes Non Confundit, 10)

While governments have a responsibility to enforce the laws and administer justice, Pope Francis reminds us that even those who break the laws are still children of God. I know people who are involved in prison ministry and they speak to me about the deep hunger for God found there and the need for hope.

What are some things we can do in this Jubilee Year?

You can read the whole article here.




Sunday, February 9, 2025

Sunday Best: Spring Movie Season 2025

  We are in the odd time for theatrical movies.  Summer is when a number of the big blockbusters are released.  Fall and Winter are when we see more of the prestige pictures.  But the spring season is strange.  Yes, there are some bigger movies coming out, but it always feels like this is the time when studios keep their powder dry and get ready to fire their big guns later.


That isn't always the case.  Deadpool, I believe, was a February release.  And that film went on to do some amazing business.

So here are some of the movies that are coming out along with my level of excitement.  My ability to get out to the theater may be limited this time around.  But I will try to get to the ones that really excite me.

Here is a list, with a few brief thoughts of my own, including on a scale of 1-5 stars my likelihood of seeing it in theaters (1 being “Not at all” 5 being “Cannot wait!”).


February 7th

Love Hurts (*****)

This movie seems like it is hitting on all cylanders.  It feels like an American Jackie Chan movie in the best possible way.  And I have such a sense of good will towards Ke Huy Kwan.  It looks like a great date movie: action and romance.



February 14

Captain America: Brave New World (****)
An illustrated collage of the film's characters.


There has been a lot online hate for this movie and I know that it has been plagued by a lot of expensive reshoots.  Despite that, I am rooting for this movie to do well.  I like Anthony Mackie and I am hopeful that this will be a fun thriller like The Winter Soldier.


Paddington in Peru (*)

I haven't seen any of the other ones, though I heard good things about them.




February 21st

The Unbreakable Boy (***)

This could be a sweet family film about autism.  I don't know if it will be good, but I think I might take a chance on it.


The Monkey (*)

Nothing about this seems appealing to me.




Febrary 28th

Last Breath (**)

This looks like ti could be a fun thriller, but I think I will wait for streaming.


March 7 

Micke 17 (*)
undefined

This movie looks truly awful.  I don't why people keep saying that this director is good or interesting.  I am going to go out on a limb and say that this is going to bomb big time.




March 14

Novocaine (****)

This movie looks odd and violent in the best possible way.  It feels like a comedic John Wick.  And I find Jack Quaid quite charming.
 

March 21

Snow White (**)


Like the new Captain America, this movie has been getting a lot of online hate.  Except in this case, I tend to lean with those who are skeptical.  


The Alto Knights (**)

This seems like an interesting story, but I don't know that I want to pay theater prices to see it.




April 4

A Minecraft Movie (*)
A cubic bee flies over a blocky sky background. The logo sits in the middle with the release info at the bottom.

Not only is this movie not for me, it also looks really, really stupid




April 18

Sinners  (*)

This could be a strong, stylized vampire thriller, but it does not seem to be my taste

April 25

The Accountant 2 (****)


I really liked the original and I always watch it when it comes on TV.  I'm also a big Affleck fan, so I am hopeful this will be part of a second Ben-aissance

Thoughts?





Thursday, February 6, 2025

Trailer Time: Jurassic World Rebirth



The previous Jurassic World Trilogy petered out with a whimper (albeit a multi-billion-dollar whimper).  The first movie was a bit silly, but also a great deal of fun.  The second one was very stupid and the third was slightly less stupid.

This reboot feels very much like The Lost World.  This makes sense, since I heard that some of the people who made The Lost World are helping make this one.  Like that original sequel, this looks like to be, at heart, a heist movie set on an island of monsters.

Some of the visuals look nice and scary.  The shot of the man in the hazmat suit trapped in the room with the dinosaur was the stuff of nightmares.

Normally I would be a little weary of the trope of the no-nonsense girl-boss.  But Scarlett Johansson is one of the few actresses that I think can pull it off well.  Not only does she has she built up a pop culture cache as Black Widow, but as she demonstrated in Fly Me To The Moon, she has enough charisma and star power to carry a movie.  The rest of the cast seems fine, though I would like to see more.

Overall, I'm hoping that this is going to be a return to form for the franchise.

Thoughts?

Tuesday, February 4, 2025

Trailer Time: The Fantastic Four: First Steps - Official Teaser



This is the first teaser trailer for the new Fantastic Four film, which will be the second reboot of the franchise, but this time it will be a part of the MCU.

Here are my thoughts:

THE GOOD

-Retro '60's Look: 
I like the overall aesthetic, which reminds me of the space race I saw in Fly Me To The Moon.  It is visually very interesting and different than what we have seen already in a super hero film.

-The Uniforms
I think they nailed the style and tone of the uniforms better than in any of the previous films.  

-The Thing
I liked this CGI Thing.  I especially like that moment when he sees his old self in the TV.  He seems monstrous, but relatable.

-Human Torch
I wasn't sure about Joseph Quinn's casting, but he seems to embody the devil-may-care attitude of Johnny Storm fairly well in the brief shots of him.

-Invisible Woman
So far, I am very hopeful that Vanessa Kirby will finally give us the Sue Storm we've been waiting for.  I don't think the other two quite captured the balance between her power and her femininity.  I like what I see here so far.

-Galactus
I'm excited to see we may get a comic-accurate Galactus on screen.  I'm hopeful it won't look cheesy.


THE BAD

-Cooking
I didn't like that they spent so much time on cooking.  This may be a reference to the actor playing the Thing and how he is on that cooking show The Bear.  But I don't think that this was the best time to highlight this as a way to sell me.

-Mister Fantastic
I'm not sold on Pedro Pascal as Reed Richards.  He seems a bit generic and not like the smartest man on Earth.


THOUGHTS?

Sunday, February 2, 2025

Sunday Best: Oscar Game 2025

 OBJECT: Get the most points!


HOW TO PLAY:  Fill out a score sheet for each category with your choice (who you want to win) and your prediction (who you think WILL win).  

CATEGORIES

1.  MAJOR AWARDS

-Best Picture
-Best Director
-Best Actor
-Best Actress
-Best Supporting Actor
-Best Supporting Actress
-Best Original Screenplay
-Best Adapted Screenplay
-Best Original Score
-Best Original Song
-Best Animate Feature



On the night of the Oscars, give yourself 1 point for each correct guess in MY PREDICTIONS.  If you get a prediction wrong, subtract 1 point.  Give yourself 1/2 (.5) point for each correct guess in MY CHOICE.  There is no penalty for incorrect guesses for MY CHOICE.


For example:
Category

BEST DIRECTOR

-MY CHOICE = Coralie Fargeat, The Substance
-MY PREDICTION = James Mangold, A Complete Unknown

BEST ACTOR

-MY CHOICE =Timothée Chalamet, A Complete Unknown
-MY PREDICTION = Adrien Brody, The Brutalist"

BEST ACTRESS

-MY CHOICE = Demi Moore, The Substance
-MY PREDICTION = Demi Moore, The Substance

If James Mangold wins Best Director, gain 1 point for a correct guess in MY PREDICTIONS, but no points for an incorrect MY CHOICE  (total points = 1)

If Timothée Chalamet wins Best Actor, gain 1 point, for a correct MY CHOICE, but subtract 1 point for an incorrect MY PREDICTION (total points = [-.5])

If Demi Moore wins Best Actress, gain 1 points for correct MY CHOICE and 1 correct MY PREDICTION.  (total points =1.5)

If Karla Sofia Gascon wins Best Actress, lose 1 point for an incorrect MY PREDICTION, but lose no points for an incorrect MY CHOICE (total = [-1])


You may NOT make a guess for a MY CHOICE in a category if you have not seen any of the films in the category.  You may, however, make a blind guess for the MY PREDICTION section even if you have not seen any of the nominees.



2.  TECHNICAL AWARDS

-Best Editing
-Best Cinematography
-Best Visual Effects
-Best Sound Editing
-Best Sound Mixing
-Best Makeup
-Best Costumes
-Best Production Design

For these, give yourself 1/2 point (.5) for each correct guess in MY PREDICTIONS.   Give yourself 1/2 point (.5) for each correct guess in MY CHOICE.  There is no penalty for incorrect guesses for MY PREDICTIONS or MY CHOICE.

3.  MINOR AWARDS

-Best Documentary Feature
-Best Documentary Short
-Best Animated Short
-Best Live Action Short
-Best International Feature Film


For these, give yourself 1/5th of a point (.2) for each correct guess in MY PREDICTIONS.   Since so few people have seen these, there is no MY CHOICE section.  There is no penalty for incorrect guesses for MY PREDICTIONS.


PARTICIPATION:

Fill out the below score sheet and send it to me.  I will be the designated score-keeper.  You may change any choice up until the broadcast begins.


The winner will receive bragging rights and recognition on this blog.


Click the link below to fill out the form

Click this link and fill out the form


I will publish my selections before Oscar night so that everything is on the up and up.  Usually I would have done so already, but I am still thinking things through.

Thursday, January 30, 2025

New Evangelizers Post: Laws of Man, Laws of God

           


I have a new article up at NewEvangelizers.com.  

I am sometimes asked the question, “Is it a sin to break the law?”

The general answer is yes, but there is an important exception.

Civil laws are the ones enacted by the legitimate authorities of our land. As Christians, we have an obligation to follow these laws as good citizens. This is something that comes directly from the Scriptures.

Jesus said of paying taxes, “Render to Caesar what belongs to Caesar, but give to God what belongs to God.” (Mark 12:17). In Romans, Paul states, “Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment. (Romans 13:1-2).

Peter also makes this point: “Be subject for the Lord’s sake to every human institution, whether it be to the emperor as supreme, or to governors… Honor everyone. Love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honor the emperor.” (1 Peter 2:13-14, 17)

The Catechism of the Catholic Church states, “The citizen is obliged in conscience not to follow the directives of civil authorities when they are contrary to the demands of the moral order, to the fundamental rights of persons or the teachings of the Gospel. Refusing obedience to civil authorities, when their demands are contrary to those of an upright conscience, finds its justification in the distinction between serving God and serving the political community.” (2242)

Human beings are called to live harmoniously in a society. If we are to live in a nation of laws, then we must bind ourselves to those laws. That is the implicit social contract of a civil society. Therefore, breaking those laws involves a breaking of the social contract on our part. So even small things like jaywalking and littering can be sinful if they break the the laws of our land.

However…

The only reason that the civil law has authority over us is if it is harmony with Natural Law.

Natural Law is the moral law written on our hearts. God gave us reason to discover what is right and what is wrong for human beings. For example, the end or purpose of the human person is to live a good life. But if you murder someone, you are preventing them their natural end. Therefore, murder is wrong. The principle of self-defense also applies here. If you kill someone who is trying to kill you, you are morally justified because that person is trying to obstruct your natural right to live.

We enact civil laws in order to live out the Natural Law.

But if the civil law contradicts the Natural Law, then we are not bound to follow it.

You can read the whole article here.




Sunday, January 26, 2025

Sunday Best: Oscar Nominations 2025

 

 So the nominees were announced this past week for the 97th Academy Awards.


These awards remain the most prestigious in film.  And while many of you, dear readers, are of the opinion that all awards shows are terrible and should simply be shunned, it is my perpetual hope that Hollywood will reform itself and once again nominate movies that matter.


While there were a few happy nominations, there are a few hopeful signs, but none that make me think that the redemption of Hollywood is just around the corner.  Once again, the elite in the industry will gather together, kick out the homeless from the streets, and congratulate themselves.


The movies nominated for Best Picture are:




The top 10 highest grossers for 2024 are:

Inside Out 2
Deadpool & Wolverine
Wicked
Moana 2
Despicable Me 4
Beetlejuice Beetlejuice
Dune: Part 2
Twisters
Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire
Kung Fu Panda 4

There are 2 movies nominated in the top ten earners of the year.  But once again, a lot of these movies have not been seen by the general public.  After Wicked and Dune: Part 2, the next highest grossing nominee is Conclave, grossing only $30 million.  But even the re-release of Coraline (a movie 13-years-old) made more money at the box office.  And I do not mean to say that movies with small box office returns are the only ones that should be nominated.  I thought Horizon: An American Saga Chapter One was excellent and that movie flopped.  But if you look at most of these nominees, the average person will not know them.


So as you can see, there are very few films for viewers at home to root for.

 My own top ten of the year include:
Deadpool & Wolverine
Horizon: An American Saga Chapter One
Wicked
Super/Man: The Christopher Reeve Story
One Life
A Complete Unknown
Dune: Part 2
Inside Out 2
Furiosa
Transformers One


So below are my thoughts on some (not all) of this year's nominees.  

It is clear from the nominations that there is a strong socio/political tone to this year's awards.  But it is also clear that this year's election signals a cultural shift.  The question becomes whether or not the industry will adjust to this new reality or if they will vote out of protest.

There are signs that Hollywood is moderating.  You can see this in the mature content being cut from some Disney programing.  Also, with so much struggle and hardship that Los Angeles has gone through, I will wonder if national politics will be on their mind or finding something that can unify.

If the Academy decides that they want to be relevant to the general audiences, I think Wicked will do very well.  Although the fact that the director was not nominated speaks volumes about where they are leaning.  If the Academy decides to vote as a protest to this cultural shift, then I think Emilia Perez and The Apprentice will score some wins.

I am going to be looking at the other awards, particularly the Screen Actors Guild, Director's Guild, and Producer's Guild to see who people are feeling.

BEST PICTURE

I've only seen Conclave, A Complete Unknown, Dune Part 2, and Wicked, so I can't speak much outside of those 4.  Two of them were in my Top 5 for the year, so that, at least, is something.  

If the Academy were smart, they would lean on Wicked, which was a big crowd-pleaser and also seemed to appeal to the artistic types in Hollywood.

BEST DIRECTOR

I only saw Mangold's movie and I think that he did an excellent job.  Although I heard that The Substance as a unique visual style to it.  

BEST ACTRESS

Erivo was my choice for best actress this year and I am happy to see that she received the nomination.  Again, if the Academy is smart, they will default to her.  I don't think anyone will be watching any of the other movies in the years to come.  This year it is also of note because this is the first time a biological male has been nominated.  This could lead to the eventual erasure of gender-separate categories.  But as was seen in the Brit Awards, this can sometimes lead to no women getting nominated.

BEST ACTOR

I've only seen Chalamet and Fiennes, both of whom turned in excellent performances.  If the Oscars turn into a political protest vote, Stan may get the win.

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS

I don't know how Grande, who gave the worst performance this year, got a nomination.  Rossellini and Barbaro were very good in their roles and I'd be happy if either of them won.

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR

I was very happy to see Norton get a nomination for A Complete Unknown.  I thought he did an excellent job portraying a decent man trying to direct the reckless Bob Dylan.  I heard that Culkin is a lock, but I haven't seen the movie yet.

BEST COSTUME DESIGN

Again, Wicked's costume designs were the best this year.  They were unique and visually interesting.  I prefer these types of original costumes to period pieces.


BEST ANIMATED FEATURE

I've only seen Inside Out 2, but I've heard good things about Flow and The Wild Robot

Those are just some of my initial thoughts in some of the categories.  

Thoughts?